You are abusing the wrong law to do the right thing. You should be using privacy related laws for revenge porn, not copyright ones. Your actions prove OP's point.
This is clearly a service aimed at sex workers protecting their work. In that case, the DMCA certainly does apply.
Flavouring their description with language like "non-consensual" seems dishonest, though.
If you think that people won’t pay $25 to remove all the images and videos uploaded to porn across the internet with a few button clicks then you’ve clearly never had to worry about such things.
Someone would have to spend $500k to scan and process the internet before they could come close to offering the coverage we could for $25.
It’s incredible what kind of bubble HN lives in sometimes.
EDIT: also, we limit it to two free DMCA’s to prevent abuse and we have a tutorial on our site on how to do your own DMCA for free.
We’re not running an exploitative business, we’re helping people.
Could you do both? DMCA for a fast response, then a civil privacy related lawsuit for compensation etc? The civil suit can take ages.
Inferring it's the USA from DMCAs, which states are lacking privacy laws, thus making revenge porn legal?
Why would I do anything else when I’m not abusing DMCA.