You agreed to it: "We may review content to determine whether it is illegal or violates our Program Policies, and we may remove or refuse to display content that we reasonably believe violates our policies or the law." https://www.google.com/drive/terms-of-service/?hl=en
Their list of policy violations is quite long: https://support.google.com/docs/answer/148505#zippy=
> You agreed to it:
I highly doubt that: "clicking agree" and "agreeing" are two entirely separate things.
Literally no one has the time or ability to read, let alone agree, with the things they're forced to click through* in order to live in the modern world.
Therefore, Google gave themselves the right as the GP claimed.
* either literally by clicking through, or by opening up a box an using a product, or by having something like that silently and unilaterally amended, etc.
It’s amusing to start a new console game and have to agree to a 30 page wall of text. Wait, let me have my lawyer review this before I sit down to play single-player CoD (choose your own game from a mega-studio).
Or more recently, the Black Mirror episode Joan is Awful
You could argue that you could have not used the product in the first place, but for me (not the person you're replying to), the TOS was very different in 2006. I cannot simply just move to a different service. There was no true choice.
Further, if it is a corporate account, the user needs to make a living thus must choose to use the product or tell their employer they need to quit. There is no true choice.