>FTC: What about Diablo? Can you promise it will ship on all future versions of PlayStation?
>Spencer: Can I promise? I am able to promise, yes.
The kind of obnoxious reply I'd expect from somebody on Xbox live, not their chief.
>Spencer: Can I promise? I am able to promise, yes.
The kind of obnoxious reply I'd expect from somebody on Xbox live, not their chief.
Maybe he was thinking out loud, but they should have known full well what the judge was asking and by refusing to answer the clarified follow-up they seemed to be doing whatever they could to weasel out of saying anything meaningful.
If that was their response, I'd have no issue with it. I dislike the "technically I can but won't" answer followed by silence. It shows an attempt to deceive.
It's a prod to get people to say what they actually want, instead of asking a vague questions with a stronger implication because it waters down the actual meaning of the words and is as weaselly as the response. Asking for the ability, requesting an action and giving a command are different things. Doubly so in hearings by government officials.
"Will no one rid me of this turbulent priest?"
You obviously have information that is counter to this, I for one would appreciate if you could produce it. Xbox executives can then be charged criminally and prosecuted.
Is that written enough for you? 4 seconds of googling.