Continental Selling Options on Tickets
nytimes.com
nytimes.com
Of course it isn't. It doesn't generate dividends and I can't sell it. Idiocy.
My real fear: Continental starts paying Kayak and co. for data on who is searching for what, and when. Price 'insurance' becomes necessary because Continental jacks up prices as soon as they see a spike in demand.
Continental is already serving essentially every kayak search. They know how many people are searching for what, even if they don't know exactly who. If they want to raise prices as a result of search spike, they can already do that.
But the option is only for buying a ticket from Continental within seven days. It's not like if prices go up, you can sell your option to someone else and pocket the difference like you can with traditional options. Since the tickets are most likely tied to non-transferable fares, their function is pretty limited.
None of this is good for consumers, the only way the airlines make money off insuring things is if we loose more of it in the long run, and none of these expenses are large enough to justify the payment. Just like the service plans at best buy.
It should simply not be legal.
I've never understood all the gloom and doom surrounding the airline industry, anyway. There is still ample demand for air travel. Especially considering the lack of viable alternatives in the US, I can't imagine we'll reach a point any time soon when air travel isn't commercially viable.
Jet Blue, for example, has been doing quite well in the last few years. The biggest reason for this isn't their (quite wonderful) service or (relatively new) air fleet; it's because their fuel contracts were signed at a damn near perfect moment.
Airlines run razor thin margins. A few percent savings in fuel can easily double their margin, which can be then spent on marketing, fleet improvements, sniping experienced pilots by offering higher wages, or any other form of capital investment.