Hacker News Reader

Comment by boffinAudio | Hacker News Reader

The treatment of Julian Assange is a reprehensible stain on the assumed moral authority of the one nation on Earth that falls over itself to lecture the rest of the world on human rights, when it suits it, time and time again.

How any reasonable member of the 5-eyes superstate can tolerate the chemical lobotomy of Julian in one of the most repressive institutions the West has ever seen, astonishes me. We are truly manifesting the very things Hanna Arendt strived hard to warn her generations about, and as the days go by that Julian and others like him slip into the dark abyss of America's military industrial complex, I fret for the free world, such as it remains.

And now we witness the depravity of America's utterly corrupt intellience reich, which extends supra-national tentacles into the bowels of the beast, to cover its own vast and heinous crimes against humanity and violations of human rights at insane scales.

None of this protects us. It makes us entirely weaker as a society. As the totalitarian-authoritarian personalities get their way, cover their crimes, and victimize those who warned us of it all, I hope our children have the temerity to confront our failings.

This atrocity must stop: FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW.

(The leaks will continue for as long as the crimes do, also!)

View on HN

Lost respect for Julien Assange when Wikileaks became pickey and choosey about what they leaked based on who they support politically.

Why do you think that position is appropriate, though? Any private organization can choose its battles. It turns out that Wikileaks was stringently anti-imperialist, and anti-war, and wanted the world to know that the one nation that makes the claim of moral authority over human rights, invading and destroying any nation or culture it deems inferior to its own, was in fact its worst violator. Remember: Julian is a citizen of one of the worst violators of human rights in the Western world. Why wouldn't he work tirelessly to address that issue, and his native country's corrupt participation in the criminal 5-eyes cabal?

The idea that a private organization working on addressing our war crimes and our crimes against humanity and our violations of human rights at mass scale is 'corrupt because it does not complain about the Russians' at scales demanded by a collective in-party factually ruled by the actual criminals involved, is not only highly specious, but also extremely destructive to the effort to attain justice for our victims.

And, isn't that really the point of this position, and the destruction of Wikileaks, and the lobotomization of Julian - to prevent the circumstances where the real war criminals are removed from power to face real justice?

Why should we clean up Russia's mess? We are not Russian. We are members of the 5-eyes superstate that has been committing crimes against humanity, on average, every twenty minutes for twenty years. The magnitude of that crime is so enormous that we simply will never be able to address the war crimes of other nations while we continue to be ruled by our own war criminals. Which Wikileaks was in a position to understand, quite well, on the frontlines of the leaks.

So I think your position is just butt-hurt, sorry for putting it so blunt. The magnitude of our crimes requires a much more serious effort not to ignore them, and bleat (whatabout?!) about others, instead.

Your position is analogous to the school bully whining because one of the lesser kids also didn't get punished for their bullying, too. Yet. But that's absolutely specious, imho - at least until we demonstrate the real moral authority we claim, and start sending our own war criminals off to rot in chains in The Hague. Where they really, really belong.

You start with the biggest criminal bullies first. Always. And that's exactly what Wikileaks and Julian did, and should be respected for...

> It turns out that Wikileaks was stringently anti-imperialist, and anti-war.

Ah so I suspect Wikileaks has started publishing Russian leaks once Russia showed itself to be an imperialist beast then right?.

> Why wouldn't he work tirelessly to address that issue, and his native country's corrupt participation in the criminal 5-eyes cabal?

Im confused, are you aware that Assange is Australian?.

You can see Wikileaks reporting on Australia here.

https://wikileaks.org/wiki/Category:Australia

It's super minimal.

> Why should we clean up Russia's mess? We are not Russian. We are members of the 5-eyes superstate that has been committing crimes against humanity, on average, every twenty minutes for twenty years. The magnitude of that crime is so enormous that we simply will never be able to address the war crimes of other nations while we continue to be ruled by our own war criminals. Which Wikileaks was in a position to understand, quite well, on the frontlines of the leaks.

I am going to regret asking this but these extraordinary claims are going to require evidence.

> You start with the biggest criminal bullies first. Always. And that's exactly what Wikileaks and Julian did, and should be respected for...

Then we must go for Russia first, this is no recent analogue to Russias coordinated execution, rape and torture of civilians, in not just Ukraine but in Chechnya too.

> Then we must go for Russia first, this is no recent analogue to Russias coordinated execution, rape and torture of civilians, in not just Ukraine but in Chechnya too.

Are you seriously suggesting Russia is responsible for more death and destruction around the world than the US?

> Are you seriously suggesting Russia is responsible for more death and destruction around the world than the US?

I am suggesting that Russias wars are far more brutal than America's.

There is no systematic rape and torture involved in America's wars.

It's pretty much a stable of Russias recent wars.

to quote the UN report.

"Investigating cases related to sexual and gender-based violence present specific challenges. The Commission has found that some Russian Federation soldiers committed such crimes. These acts amounted to different types of violations of rights, including sexual violence, torture, and cruel and inhuman treatment. There are examples of cases where relatives were forced to witness the crimes. In the cases we have investigated, the age of victims of sexual and gendered-based violence ranged from four to 82 years.".

> There is no systematic rape and torture involved in America's wars

Please..

https://capl.army.mil/case-studies/wcs-single.php?id=78&titl...

Read about the My Lai massacre

about torture in Abu Ghraib

About the bombing of Kunduz Hospital

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/oct/22/iraq-checkpoin...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_war_crimes

Of course, your reaction might be: "these are only one-off cases, it's not systematic!"

It's always unreported. Or reported several years after the fact (when there's nothing that can be done about it). Or it's always "excusable", "accidental"...

But when the other side does it, it's always proof of their barbaric attitudes.

There's a comic about this:

https://twitter.com/tomgauld/status/571994690289061888

> https://capl.army.mil/case-studies/wcs-single.php?id=78&titl...

A single case is hardly systematic.

> My Lai massacre

>> 16 March 1968

Whilst Russia is still stuck in the 1960's the rest of the world has come a long way since then and generally agrees that the atrocities committed then where quite bad.

But honestly, if you have to go back 55 years to find a comparable event I dare say the Russians are brutal.

> Of course, your reaction might be: "these are only one-off cases, it's not systematic!"

It is.

> It's always unreported. Or reported several years after the fact (when there's nothing that can be done about it). Or it's always "excusable", "accidental"...

I agree!.

Just think about how many more civilians have been raped and tortured in Ukraine that haven't been reported, we have seen so much reported smoke the fire must be bigger than any other fire recent memory.

> But when the other side does it, it's always proof of their barbaric attitudes.

I think its terrible what the US did.

Do you think its terrible that Russia rapes and tortures civilians in Ukraine?.

> Do you think its terrible that Russia rapes and tortures civilians in Ukraine?.

I think it's terrible, just as much as it's terrible that the US rapes and torture civilians in the middle east.

But that's inflammatory language, which I don't like to use.

I prefer to say that some US soldiers rape and torture civilians, and some Russian soldiers rape and torture civilians.

That's not to excuse the soldiers. And even if they join the military as destitute teenagers (be they US or Russians), they should put effort in atoning for their contribution to large scale suffering.

Basically, we shouldn't treat all soldiers the same: they aren't all war criminals, and they aren't all veterans worthy of respect. It's a career choice.

Of course, most of the responsibility lies with people like Colin Powell, George Bush, Sergei Shoigu, Vladimir Putin, etc...

That's the thing that is left unsaid often: If the conflict is big enough, there are always war crimes (on either side). That was inevitable once the invasion started, and this should've factored in the decision: it was evidently considered an acceptable cost.

That's the monstruous thing, and yet it's pretty banal: monstruous bureacrauts or accountants decided that the benefits outweighed the cost in human lives (and some of these lives would be innocent civilians, victims of rape or torture).

But considering that is useful only if you're inside the country that is engaged in the military effort. If you're outside, focusing on that doesn't help to de-escalate while the war is still raging. The material conditions guide everyone's decisions, and war is no different.

> I think it's terrible, just as much as it's terrible that the US rapes and torture civilians in the middle east.

But the scale is different, that's what people like you are refusing to see.

Just because one US soldier rapes one person in 10 20 years, doesn't make them the same as the Russian armed forces who regularly use sexual violence in warfare.

One is a once off horrible tragedy, the other is a clear systematic issue that the Russian army cannot seem to stop if they even want to.

> Basically, we shouldn't treat all soldiers the same: they aren't all war criminals, and they aren't all veterans worthy of respect. It's a career choice.

Yes but clearly the Russian army has more soldiers who are happy to use the Geneva convention as a checklist more than as a list of things to avoid.

> That's the thing that is left unsaid often: If the conflict is big enough, there are always war crimes (on either side). That was inevitable once the invasion started, and this should've factored in the decision: it was evidently considered an acceptable cost.

Yes but I haven't seen a conflict in probably close to 40 years with war crimes, especially the sexual violence and genocide that anywhere near the scale of what Russia is doing in Ukraine.

> But the scale is different, that's what people like you are refusing to see.

Our main disagreement seems to be the scale of the civilian casualties (and other war crimes, which is of course in proportion to that).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Iraq_War#IBC...

lists 12,152 for 2003 and 11,737 for 2004. With the caveat that:

> Gaps in recording and reporting suggest that even our highest totals to date may be missing many civilian deaths from violence

So, for first year and a half of hostilities, we can expect that the lower bound to be between 17k and 18k.

The confirmed civilian casualties in Ukraine since February 2022 are around 9k:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_invasion_of_Ukraine#Ca...

(and of these, only ~4100 are due to Russian attacks. Compare with the Iraq war, were US civilians were thousands of km away from the frontlines)

https://www.ohchr.org/en/news/2023/06/ukraine-civilian-casua...

The actual numbers are of course higher than the confirmed numbers (again: lower bounds in both cases), but it's within the same order of magnitude.

Moreover, take into account the fact that Iraq had a population of 25M in 2003, vs Ukraine that has a population of 45M.

You might not be aware of it, but I've seen people genuinely argue that Russia has been exceedingly careful in trying to only strike military targets, and that's why the "civilian casualties rate is so low, compared to other conflicts". I hope that's true, but I think that it's premature to draw any conclusions about that, because the fog of war still means that there's huge uncertainty in the actual numbers (it could even be as high as, or slightly worse than in Iraq).

You must of missed the part where I was specifically talking about sexual violence.

I know that civilian causalities are high for both sides.

The difference as I said before is that Russia and uses much more sexual violence and torture.

Russia rate of sexual violence and torture is off the charts.

You had to go back decades just to find a single case of something close to comparable in the US army.

> You might not be aware of it, but I've seen people genuinely argue that Russia has been exceedingly careful in trying to only strike military targets, and that's why the "civilian casualties rate is so low, compared to other conflicts".

Russia specifically targets civilian targets, when a PGM levels a shopping mall or a cafe it’s not an accident.

The truth is exactly the opposite of what you’re claiming.

> (it could even be as high as, or slightly worse than in Iraq).

It’s likely much worse than Iraq with Russia the cruelty is the point.

The US specifically targets civilians, too. The moral authority you claim doesn't exist.

Mosul, Raqqa, Damascus. Just a few easily-remembered examples. Did you not pay attention?

Exactly, moreover... His comment

> I was specifically talking about sexual violence.

Makes it clear that he tried to move the discussion away from recognizing civilian suffering and opposing the countries which oppressed most of the world with their military force first... Towards just trying to make a case for Russia to be "more brutal", regardless of factual accuracy. For some people, stoking outrage takes priority.

It's not the first time that the propaganda is trying to scaremonger about a "horde from the east":

https://redsails.org/hordes-of-rapists

> Makes it clear that he tried to move the discussion away from recognizing civilian suffering and opposing the countries which oppressed most of the world with their military force first... Towards just trying to make a case for Russia to be "more brutal", regardless of factual accuracy. For some people, stoking outrage takes priority.

More so that im trying to concentrate the discussion on the brutality of the Russian army instead of the abject apathy that the Americans have for civilians causalities.

> It's not the first time that the propaganda is trying to scaremonger about a "horde from the east":

If you want to keep defending a country that rapes and tortures children go ahead, but know that you're aligning yourself with the new monsters of Europe and I hope you're okay with that.

I guess people supported nazis in WW2 so I shouldn't be surprised that people are supporting the Russians now.

> concentrate the discussion on the brutality of the Russian army instead

If you think what the American military did to Mosul and Raqqa is not an utter brutality, there is no hope for your further arguments of moral authority.

The fact is that the US' military is more vile and brutal than its captive civilian population is capable of admitting, or even understanding - since those same brutes own your media industry and will never show you what they did, almost every day since 2003, to utterly innocent human beings.

Cultures that Americas' war-criminal class have deemed inferior - on the basis of racial or religious assumed authority, have been suffering miserably for decades because people such as yourself make excuses for the heinous crimes committed in your name, instead of informing yourself as to the truth and nature of the magnitude of those crimes.

Russia is bad, very bad - but it has a long, long way to go to catch up to the depravity and calamity that the US visits on innocent people, every twenty minutes for twenty years. It matters not one iota to the fathers and mothers digging their children out from under the piles of smouldering rubble left across the landscape, if you think your forces are 'the ethical ones'. You'd know that if you'd taken the time to really, really understand the victims of your state, which are only there because of your own ignorance and failure to reign in your own war criminals as a responsible citizen.

Perhaps you profit from the war machine. This is another reason why people think their war machine is better/more moral than any other war machine, but here's a clue: there are no moral war machines, no ethical war machines, no war machine with a more 'divine purpose set by God'. There are only humanity-destroying apparatus, which exist purely because citizens are too lazy or cowardly to confront their war mongers and send them off to The Hague to rot in chains where they belong. Putin can sit there to rot too - right alongside Clinton and Bush and Biden and Obama and Trump - where they all truly, truly belong. But I assure you, Putins' crimes pale into insignificance when it comes to his peers. You better inform yourself, better.

We have already discussed but you seem more than happy to try and wash away Russias penchant for raping and torturing children in foreign nations.

I think American did and does terrible things and more terrible things then Russia.

Do you think that Russias should stop committing the crimes it does?.

Do you think killing someone is worse then raping a child?.

> if you think your forces are 'the ethical ones'.

I never said this.

I am not Russian and can therefore do nothing effective about Russia's atrocities.

I am a subject member of the 5-eyes superstate that has been committing heinous war crimes and crimes against humanity, in my name and yours (possibly), for decades.

Therefore the imperative for you and me is to address the very real and very serious war crimes of our own people, first and foremost - before we set those very same war criminals the task of 'doing something about Russia'.

Unless you are Russian, there is nothing peaceful you can do about Russias crimes. Period. The moral authority you claim, to elevate ones own war criminals over those of other nations', is not only a fallacy but does a huge disservice to the 34 million+ victims of our own war criminals.

Stop bleating, uselessly, about Russia. Start instead calling, effectively, for the heads of your own war criminals to be presented on a platter at the ICC. Where they truly, truly belong. Only when that occurs, will the conditions for justice for Russia's victims also be in place.

Until Americans close the 1000+ black op CIA torture sites they willfully fund every single year, nobody in the rest of the free world is going to follow your endless war-crime committing classes into yet another disaster.

> The US specifically targets civilians, too. The moral authority you claim doesn't exist.

When was the last time the US raped and tortured a child as young as 4?, cause the Russians have already done it in Ukraine.

You tell me, since you believe that apparently no heinous crimes committed by western soldiers are being hidden.

> Soldiers and Marines were instructed to look the other way in the face of violent child abuse, even when it took place on U.S. military bases

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2015/09/american-militar...

If you're so worried about

> raped and tortured a child as young as 4

Why don't you react to children being thrown out of incubators?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nayirah_testimony

Of course this is rhetorical: it's very easy for you to stoke outrage for something for which there is no proof.

Again, I encourage you to read:

https://redsails.org/hordes-of-rapists/

You have some gall to make parallels between "supported nazis in WW2", and being opposed to indiscriminate war now... Given that you're parroting actual Nazi propaganda from the 1940s

Wikipedia is not a good source of the casualty data of America's wars, as it is highly censored and intelligence goons pay a lot of attention to this fact, since the American people must be lulled into complacency over their wars in order to support them, and if they knew the real truth there'd no trillion-dollar yearly budget for yet more, endless war.

Iraq lost 5% of its population to American war aggression. Just ask the doctors: https://psr.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/body-count.pdf

Note that this report is 10 years old now, and the statistics have gotten far worse. The deleterious effect of depleted uranium on the birth-rate of the population is there for all and sundry to observe ..

>> Are you seriously suggesting Russia is responsible for more death and destruction around the world than the US?

Yes, without any question. WWII alone is responsible for tens of millions of deaths. USSR enabled Germany by dividing Europe with them in Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, which was followed by joint invasion of Poland weeks later, war against Finland, occupation of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania, massacres like Katyn on the newly occupied territories, and eventually the war between themselves. USSR supplied hundreds of thousands of tons of all kinds of raw materials (oil, iron, grains, etc) between 1940 and 1941 to support German war effort in the West. 2/3 of all imported goods to Germany in 1940 and 1941 came from the USSR. Oil train after oil train went to Germany while Luftwaffe was bombing London.

Not to mention what went on 1941-1945... There's a book by Russian war reporter who recorded atrocities committed in Prussia. One scene had small groups of Russian soldiers and officers across a field as far as the eye can see, all with their pants down, waiting for their turn to rape German women who they had found in a refugee convoy. Houses in "liberated" towns were full of naked women dead in blood-soaked beds, sexual organs destroyed from non-stop raping. In total, several million women were raped in state-sanctioned violence against German civilians in the closing months of WWII. They raped even "liberated" concentration camp prisoners.

But if that's too old for you and you want more modern examples, read a few books on the Soviet-Afghan war in 1980s or the Chechen wars in 1990s, preferrably translations of works by independent Russian authors like Anna Politkovskaya and Svetlana Alexievich. You will find similar unmatched brutality.

Believing that the actions of US government come even close are... naive.

You are comparing the USSR with modern America. This is a classic American agitprop technique - necessary, because you are entirely unaware of the magnitude of the crimes against humanity and war crimes being committed in your name every single day.

The USA drops bombs on innocent people, on average, at a rate of one bomb dropped on an innocent person, every twenty minutes, for the last twenty years.

There are 34 million refugees from Americas' wars, started in 2003.

Iraq lost 5% of its population to American war agression, and still loses children every single day as a consequence of America's invasion.

You'd really better inform yourself. The USA is the #1 promoter of terrorism and calamity in the world today. https://airwars.org/

Russia has a long way to go to catch up with the US' war crimes and crimes against humanity, committed this century - not to mention the massive violations of human rights that is occurring as part of the heinously criminal 5-eyes regime.

A long, long way to go.

>Believing that the actions of US government come even close are... naive.

I think you have to be very, very ignorant - bordering on cowardly - if this is your position today.

Don't you know what your country did to Mosul? To Raqqa? To Libya?

> Are you seriously suggesting Russia is responsible for more death and destruction around the world than the US?

A 'benefit' of genocides is that few if anyone is left tot tell the tale.

Wikipedia has a decent record on the methods of Russian imperial expansion. Sure, many European colonial powers did similar things, but America's empire was won not quite as violently as those.

Anyone that has studied how Russia copied Mongolian methods wholesale knows that they were particularly violent.

>Ah so I suspect Wikileaks has started publishing Russian leaks once Russia showed itself to be an imperialist beast then right?

This conjecture is entirely unproductive. Only Julian would know, and he has been imprisoned wrongly for years, subjected to torture, and rendered, for all intents and purposes, dead.

Julian is not Russian. He is a responsible citizen of a state that is embroiled in the worlds worst war crimes and crimes against humanity, bar none. So why should he be concerned with Russia, when his own state and its superior partners are engaged in the most ruinous of all activities imaginable, across the globe?

>Im confused, are you aware that Assange is Australian?.

Yes, and Australia is one of the worlds' worst violators of human rights. Why are you ignorant of this? Didn't you read the Wikileaks?

>I am going to regret asking this but these extraordinary claims are going to require evidence.

Read the Wikileaks. This also might be of assistance in your endeavours to inform yourself of the magnitude of the crimes committed in your name, if you are American, or a member of the criminal 5-eyes superstate: https://airwars.org/

>Then we must go for Russia first

No. Russia is #2 on the list. The USA is the worlds #1 supporter of terror groups, funder of extremism, destroyer of sovereign states, usurper of democracy. By an extreme order of magnitude.

Iraq - 5% of its population murdered by American extremists - Afghanistan, Libya, Syria - which America illegally invaded and now occupies 1/3rd of its territory, with the specific purpose of denying the Syrian people access to the resources they need to rebuild their country - Somalia.

Yemen - a nation currently suffering the tail end of a genocide of 20 million people, half of them children, that was executed under the watchful eyes of American military commanders who are on contract with a known fascist, totalitarian-authoritarian dictatorship that literally murders children as official state policy, using American military apparatus provided willfully by its criminal leadership.

Why are you ignoring these heinously vile crimes against humanity and demanding yet more endless war from your in-place war criminals, instead of demanding they be frog-marched to rot in chains in The Hague, where they belong? Oh yeah, American moral authority to murder innocents is greater and carries a bigger stick than the ICC ..

You better stop bleating about Russia and start informing yourself. Start by reading the Wikileaks materials, before its too late.

> Why are you ignoring these heinously vile crimes against humanity and demanding yet more endless war from your in-place war criminals, instead of demanding they be frog-marched to rot in chains in The Hague, where they belong? Oh yeah, American moral authority to murder innocents is greater and carries a bigger stick than the ICC ..

> You better stop bleating about Russia and start informing yourself. Start by reading the Wikileaks materials, before its too late.

America has committed heinous crimes overseas but Russia is by far worse. It's very likely America has killed more civilians because they have been involved in more wars for longer.

But there is absolutely no doubt in my mind that Russias wars are far more brutal and I don't think you are taking that into account.

Russian wars don't just involve civilian casualties they involve intentional large scale war crimes and atrocities like destroying dams, forcibly transferring children back to Russia from occupied areas and torturing and raping civilians as young as four.

Russia pretty much revels in committing genocide in Ukraine.

These types of actions are a cut above what the US has been accused of doing.

>America has committed heinous crimes overseas but Russia is by far worse.

No, this is entirely incorrect.

Just a couple of cases, out of an extraordinarily heinous litany of war crimes, and crimes against humanity: Mosul, and Raqqa. Two cities of two million people.

The military support of the genocide of 20 million souls in Yemen by a fascist totalitarian-authoritarian dictatorship: whose bombs are they, exactly?

Russia has a long way to go to catch up with the US' depravity. Your ignorance is inexcusable. Possibly you view the atrocities in Ukraine as being more vast in scale than the atrocities in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Somalia and Yemen - because these are not white people nations.

https://airwars.org/

> No, this is entirely incorrect.

This is another post entirely missing the point likely on purpose.

> Just a couple of cases, out of an extraordinarily heinous litany of war crimes, and crimes against humanity: Mosul, and Raqqa. Two cities of two million people.

Yet America has committed a lot of war crimes and has a total disregard for civilians causalities in a lot of. situations.

> Russia has a long way to go to catch up with the US' depravity. Your ignorance is inexcusable. Possibly you view the atrocities in Ukraine as being more vast in scale than the atrocities in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Somalia and Yemen - because these are not white people nations.

Russia on the hand uses sexual violence and torture as a part of their warfare on a scale that is inhumane and disgusting.

From Chechnya to Ukraine, Russia has always been less humane and more monstrous, they have always done worse things.

From raping and torturing children in Ukraine, the filtration camp system in Chechnya, to the crimes against humanity like blowing up the Kharkova dam in Ukraine.

Russians have always done worse things then America just a smaller scale.

The existence of 1,000 CIA Black-op torture sites refute your argument completely. Americans rape and torture in the privacy of their fascist CIA playgrounds.

America's military support of the genocide of Yemen by a fascist, totalitarian authoritarian dictatorship which murders and tortures children as a matter of state policy, refutes your argument, completely.

The destruction of Mosul and Raqqa - crimes against humanity of extreme magnitude - refute your claim of moral authority utterly.

>Russians have always done worse things then America just a smaller scale.

False. Because the American people have willfully allowed their own nation to get away with war crimes, crimes against humanity and massive violation of human rights at scale - without repercussions - Russia is able to merely follow the international precedent (set by the USA and its allies) for committing war crimes, and crimes against humanity, based on the internationally binding precedent established with, for example, the illegal invasion and destruction of Iraq, Libya, or Syria ... where rape and torture definitely occurred under the watchful eye of American war-fighters; albeit through the terror groups the US funded, armed, and supported, specifically for that very purpose: ISIS, Al'Qaeda, etc.

Your media simply doesn't inform you about the scale and magnitude of these crimes, because they answer to the same people profiting from bomb manufacture and delivery ... but the rest of the world sees, even if the American people are too cowardly to confront the truth.

> Ah so I suspect Wikileaks has started publishing Russian leaks once Russia showed itself to be an imperialist beast then right?.

Have you sent them documents of Russian leaks that they then chose not to publish?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com