Also despite most/all of Europe having had low fertility rate for a long time, there's still a lot of growth in some places and decline in others (mostly people moving from rural areas into the big cities, and from the poorer countries into richer ones). So stuff isn't static even if the total population number didn't change much.
In present Austria. The one you lived in till 2013 doesn't exist anymore.
Buying something decent today in one of the "major" cities is impossible even on tech wages.
Just got offered 2600 Euros take home salary for a product owner position while people are asking for 700k Euros for 20 year old houses outside of the city.
Not directly, but in various forms yes, the young can only afford to buy property if helped out with funds from their wealthy parents . It's not directly inheriting, but it's still generational wealth transfer. My ex, her parents bought her an apartment in the city center when she moved to study (not Viena, another big city). When I went to a house visit to see who can afford to pay 700k on a run down old house, it was moistly Zoomers with wealthy parents there to purchase a nest egg for their kids.
And the whole new vs old contract situation is again a generational wealth transfer. Those long ion the market sitting on cheap old contracts are swinging the balance the other direction for those new on the market who must pay exorbitant prices if they enter the market now.
Renting and being dependent on a landlord your whole life is also not ideal, especially if you didn't luck out to get locked into an older rent controlled contract at a good price, which is putting pressure on people wanting to move to a bigger palce and start families. Move to Vienna now and check out the rent prices.
>The same is true in Berlin, those that can live in an inherited home are a tiny minority.
Because Berlin demographics are mostly foreigners, but Germany is a lot bigger than Belrin, and housing there, like in Austria revolves around getting funded by the mom and dad to get intot he market.
I'm sure there really are centuries old farmhouses in Tyrol that really work like OP mentioned, but it's not the common way for Europeans to live.
That's a patently false statement.
There is room for exponential growth in housing. There is money for that exponential growth.
Those with the monies to do so simply aren't spending it on housing for median income families, single persons, elderly persons, homeless persons, etc.
Those with the financial ability simply don't spend in that manner.
There is no 'supply shortage' of housing. There are, however, discriminatory housing policies, practices, procedures, and fees.
https://news.gallup.com/poll/470888/americans-largely-satisf...
On the flip side, it probably suggests that perception of housing problem in the U.S. is mostly because of, just as with many other things, a small but very vocal minority for who it's indeed the case. It doesn't shake the economy nearly as much as it seems to be shaking public perception.
It sounds like you're saying that we could build more supply. Okay, but we haven't yet, so we're at a limit until we do.
Where were there low mortgage rates this year?