Is “nah I don’t think so” really a powerful counterargument to a page with a list of academic and government citations offering support of its claims?
Does a sharp pointy thing poke a hole in a surface more easily or less easily than a big flat thing?
The "list of academic and government citations" is all just finger-in-the-air unscientific "we think it works like this because it fits our primary school child view of the world".