From: http://www.damninteresting.com/space-radio-more-static-less-...
When any non-focused electromagnetic signal is generated– such as a television broadcast or a cell phone conversation– the energy propagates as a spherical wavefront at the speed of light. When a sphere is doubled in diameter, its surface area increases by a factor of four; but in a spherical wave the “surface area” is the energy itself. This means the signal’s energy is spread over four times more area at twice the distance, resulting in a 75% loss in intensity. To put it another way, in order for a broadcasting tower to double its effective range for a given receiver, it must quadruple its transmitting power.
To demonstrate the degrading effect of distance on an everyday omnidirectional signal, one might imagine a spacecraft equipped with an Arecibo-style radio receiver directed towards the Earth. If this hypothetical spacecraft were to set out for the interstellar medium, its massive 305-meter wide dish would lose its tenuous grip on AM radio before reaching Mars. Somewhere en route to Jupiter, the UHF television receivers would spew nothing but static. Before passing Saturn, the last of the FM radio stations would fade away, leaving all of Earth’s electromagnetic chatter behind well before leaving our own solar system.
And: http://blog.jackadam.net/2011/the-tiny-humanity-bubble/
Space... is big. Really big. You just won't believe how vastly hugely mindbogglingly big it is...
My point is space is HUGE, and it would take a stupendous amount of effort and energy to create and send a signal which Earth can correctly receive. And that's even if you specifically focus it at us.
But why would anyone specifically focus it at us, if our own signals are not focused and quickly (quickly in term of universe distances) become indistinguishable from background radiation, how would they know we are here?
What I am ultimately claiming is that even if we have intelligent radio using alien life "near by" we still would never find each other. Because even if we both have a SETI equivalent, neither one of us would initiate the huge effort necessary to send a focused "Hello" signal which the other can receive.
There are a lot of caveats on whether or not that makes sense, but assuming that an ET civilization has detected our planet (which they could do from across the galaxy) and they want to send us a message then it's not too crazy to imagine they might use radio to do so. Also, looking for such signals is pretty cheap, and the potential impact of such a detection would be enormous, so why not spend a little effort looking?
The closest galaxy to ours is about 25,000 lightyears away, according to wolframalpha. In other words, we'll have to wait that number of years before an ET civilization from there might pick up on us. I think this makes the whole endeavor completely pointless.
For all we know there is some civilization out there which periodically cycles through all the known possibly habitable planets they've detected and beams radio messages at them.
I can't find any other information about it, so I'm guessing its a hoax / April Fools joke.
I have to think it would have been a huge deal if it were real, no?
We'll receive it, but it may be hard to distinguish from noise. But this is already true, for example with spread spectrum - if the transmitters are using that we'll never known, it's almost indistinguishable from noise unless you match the same frequencies they use.