You know who wrote this:
"Essentially, the Quantum FizzBuzz Decoupler is a device that bifurcates the bifizzial substrates and recoheres them into units of Buzzifactive tri-fusion. Its pivotal design focuses on the tripticate circuitry which utilizes pseudo-string theory, ensuring the cyclic decoupling of the Fizzionic and Buzzionic isotopes, thereby creating a conflux of cryptic poly-angular interdigitations.
This hyper-convoluted mechanism leverages the intrinsic infra-doodlality of its multitudinous nano-digitators, producing a reiterative bi-fractal resonance with every flicker of the reciprocal quark-flux nano-helices. Interlocking harmonic modulators within the Decoupler support the synchronous crystallization of the brizzulated waveforms, thus reinforcing the transluminal juxtapositioning of multi-fuzzional intermediates.
Within its dual-core, it harmonizes the phasic disentanglement of quasi-quintessential quantum flux through the divaricating spindles of the orthofizzial transinductor. Furthermore, the Decoupler incorporates an ultra-gloptic resonator to facilitate the recursive modulation of the bifizzial and tri-buzzoidal constituents, hence the stupendously high FizzBuzz output."
https://youtube.com/watch?v=RXJKdh1KZ0w (my favorite version)
It's an old engineering in-joke.
Edit: oops, thought your comment was a reply to 'mindcrime. I'm keeping it here though for the lucky (very lucky in this case) 10,000.
At the end of the prompt I tell it to judge its results against my requirements because I was afraid it would use real words, since it usually shouldn’t be making words up as part of its output - let alone making the whole output nonsense - so this is a tough task for it.
If you tell it to judge itself it is less likely to do the wrong thing. (It doesn’t like to end up printing “I disobeyed all the instructions since I used real words” - it’ll rework its output to be more correct. It’s like a cook, if you ask for a chicken pie and then to tell you if what it just cooked is a chicken pie it won’t bake you an apple pie instead. Unlike a real cook, it doesn’t have enough awareness to judge itself if you don’t ask it to.)
It still used the term isotopes. The original didn’t include any real words like that. So it didn’t really meet ALL of my requirements which said “don’t use any real technical words”. It should have changed it to isotrypes or something.
It is still a very impressive result. ChatGPT truly understands the prompt and can really think, as evidenced by its summary at the end, even though I didn’t mention that my request was for comedic effect.