From part of the injunction:

  IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the following actions are NOT prohibited by this Preliminary Injunction:

  1. informing social-media companies of postings involving criminal activity or criminal conspiracies;

  2. contacting and/or notifying social-media companies of national security threats, extortion, or other threats posted on its platform;

etc.

I worry about that 2nd one creating a loophole. A lot of nefarious activity can be loosely justified as "for national security reasons." Why wouldn't the 1st set of actions be sufficient? Are there national security threats that aren't already criminalized?