A Japanese factory that designs clothes on a 40-year-old computer [video]
youtube.com
youtube.com
I was quick to pick SaaS as a target, please suggest any better alternatives. I'm trying to convey the idea that technology is not the objective, it's a tool to achieve the goal. So if cassette tapes are getting you there you don't need a fancy software and newest hardware.
You aren't very familiar with Japanese corporate culture.
I worked at a Colgate manufacturing facility. They had an NJ plant that had mechanical production lines. They've been running for 40 years so by the time i was there they were running flawlessly day in and day out and no matter what went wrong the maintenance crew knew how to fix it right away.
To save costs they shut down that plant and opened up a new one in SC with fancy brand new electronic machines that were supposed to have much better throughput. It took them years to get all the machines working and even still the old machines produced more in 8 hours than the new ones made in 12 hours. And whenever the was a problem with the machine it was always some wonky issue with the relays, sensors, and timing and we'd have sometimes days of downtime and would need OEMs to come in and fix it.
They wasted millions on that move which was supposed to save money and be more efficient. Many were fired/demoted from that.
So the thought of scrapping a working factory with decades of fine-tuning already done... pains me.
I worked with one project manager who was straight out of school. I couldn't believe that the direction and management of multiple teams of engineers was coming from someone who was going to make all their rookie mistakes on our project... and all the people who hired him already left for new jobs, so no consequences for them.
Did they fire/demote the brain geniuses who kicked this off? Because the corporate stories I know like this generally involve the responsible parties getting promotions for their bravery and forward thinking, while the pain falls on the people they forced to work on it and who unaccountably failed to implement their perfect visions.
Case in point: when Russia started it's invasion of Ukraine, one of the first things they did was to pillage the industrial areas of the regions they controlled to take away industrial equipment, including farm vehicles.
The same is for metallurgy - it was consistently upgraded through the years and not outdated in any way.
Besides, if the idea is to invade the country to incorporate some separatist regions, it doesn't make sense to destroy its economic basis and end up with a huge refugee problem and a completely deserted land you just conquered.
This is basically propaganda for gullible Americans that never traveled to Eastern Europe.
I fail to see the relevance of that. Sounds like cheap propaganda.
My point was clear: when Russia started it's invasion of Ukraine, one of the first things they did was to pillage the industrial areas of the regions they controlled to take away industrial equipment, including farm vehicles.
HN had a discussion on how John Deere kill switches were rendering Russia's pillaging useless as the stolen tractors were being remotely disabled once they were moved into Russia.
Industrial equipment, even old one, is often used extensively in spite of existing latest and greatest offers.
If this is true for all of Russia why do they keep stealing toilets?.
Yes comrade, Russia is bigger and has a lot of oligarchs so off course there's much more money there, but average citizens are piss poor. Russian elites has been robbing Ukraine for three decades with their Kremlin buddy oligarchs like Medvedchuk, and not just Ukrainian oligarchs a lot of Russian ones were quite cozy there even after 2014. They robbed eastern part of Ukraine after ceasing control over the territory. It proved to be difficult to rob whole of Ukraine with just the dirty oligarchs, so they proceeded with full scale invasion in 2022.
As OP followed up, doesn't change the facts that Russian soldiers pillaged the crap out of Ukraine as soon as they got there; Russia may be resource wealthy but corruption means that only the boys at the top get the cream, seems like everyone outside of Moscow gets the shit end of the stick.
Regardless, no amount of success excuses the slaughtering of innocents, slava ukraini.
JavaScript frameworks would be a candidate.
I've been a full-stack web developer for over a decade across multiple companies and this is the first time I've seen the phrase "discriminated unions".
And the wikipedia article is horrendous. It starts with the following sentence and gets worse from there.
> In computer science, a tagged union, also called a variant, variant record, choice type, discriminated union, disjoint union, sum type or coproduct, is a data structure used to hold a value that could take on several different, but fixed, types.
It uses lots and lots of words to explain something that's very simple. If you don't already know what it is, you can't figure out which words are important.
Then after all of the theory, it dives into a binary tree example which has to be the worst possible way to explain it. If you haven't implemented a binary tree before, you don't know any idea what you're looking at. It didn't help that I implemented a linked list in college.
Also, the choice of language ensures you have no idea what the types are. I completely missed the first example was self-referential.
It's like parody of a function programmer writing an explanation for anyone who isn't a functional programmer.
I've been programming in some form or another since the late-80s. I've been paid to write code for other people for over twenty years. I haven't gone to university.
Maybe it's because I started back in BASIC, assembler, and later C that I know what that term is and have encountered it in various languages and forms several times since?
The problem with wikipedia definitions is that they have to be the definition. Some one like me would expect a link to the definition and not a tutorial. They're not written to take into account that you've been a professional programmer and have never been exposed to a computer science curriculum nor are they written for laypersons who don't know anything about programming.
It's a similar problem for functional programmers trying to explain functors, monoids, and monads: these are not terribly complicated abstractions but catering your explanation to the various audiences out there is incredibly difficult. The definitions sounds like gibberish... but with effort and education it is possible to understand and appreciate it.
https://basarat.gitbook.io/typescript/type-system/discrimina...
I'm sincerely sorry for confusing you! Discriminated unions are nice but above I was exaggerating excessively to make a point :)
10 DEFINT A-ZI also enjoy piling on Rust fanboys,but those of us who had to go through late night troubleshooting sessions to track issues that were ultimately caused by use-after-free issues do tend to be vulnerable to Rust's memory safety siren's song
In any other situation I firmly believe the benefits Typescript brings very quickly outweigh the small amount of added complexity.
enthusiast: if you'll migrate service X from a small sets of VMs to K8s cluster (which will take N man-moths because of reasons) it will auto-scale
Old grumpy man: but the the load is low and predictable we don't need autoscale and if load will grow we will just create two more VMs
enthusiast: auto-scaling will save time in the distant and unlikely future and CTO agrees that K8s is the best way to run software so you have to migrate anyway
Because then it won't scale.
And the moment you do you run into other bottlenecks.
We're not running the DB in Kubernetes though.
For DR, Entire stack is being continually synced with a set of hot server in separate datacentre. We run a fully DR exercise yearly and it works well. It's a fairly proprietary AIX / DB2 method though so not sure you'd find value unless you're using the exact same technology stack :-/
That's perfectly ok, if your deployment costs are irrelevant and/or your company gladly pays up your infrastructure costs without a second thought.
This is not the case in some organizations, and toggling a setting to auto scale a deployment can automatically save you thousands of dollars per month.
Would you still be so casual about infrastructure costs if you had to bankroll the extra capacity you need to add to your baseline to support peaks?
The decision process involved in managing your single-box deployment is not the same that goes in managing global deployments with dozens of instances per region. Cloud providers charge a premium, and that premium is a lot.
It's like the thermostat in your office. If you're just running an AC in a single room then you can just set it to full blast to keep it day and night at a certain temperature. Once there's a decision to cut costs then you start to talk about the best time to turn off/turn on a AC unit.
Also, deploying a new build on VMs is extremely manual compared to k8s, unless again you set up some sort of home brew rube Goldberg machine to auto deploy. It's just way better to use k8s in tandem with a simple GA workflow.
Definitely not an expert, but I get the impression that this point is a lot higher that most people assume it is.
K8s makes little sense unless you run on bare-metal. Once you jump to vms you are injecting another abstraction layer and take on a herculean level of ops without understanding what you're getting into.
I'm not sure where the check points are now, but typical points where cost jumps are desktop -> server socket, single socket -> two sockets, two sockets -> four sockets, four -> eight sockets. AFAIK, AMD EPYC isn't offered at more than two sockets, and going to four sockets used to be possible off the shelf but very expensive, and eight sockets was very expensive if off the shelf or very expensive because custom engineering. Sometimes ram costs go way up for the highest density too.
[1] From Walden: read at https://www.gutenberg.org/files/205/205-h/205-h.htm
Organizations tend to invest in their operations if there are significant improvements to be made. This includes things like dealing with problems such as the availability of cassetes, if the legacy system becomes too old to maintain in a cost effective way, if it's still possible to source parts, etc.
Digital systems are widespread because they are widespread and dirt cheap, and thus the tradeoff of increasing the complexity does add value.
They also churn, and finding people who can (and will) work on legacy systems isn't easy either. Get rid of something that worked for 40 years because everyone uses this other thing (but will use something else 10 years from now that we can't predict) is dumb unless there is a very valid reason.
They're still using modern computers, the simulation of what the actual fabric would look like was amazing and I'm sure when that old computer was new, they would've killed for something like that.
Unlike the fetishists of HN, I doubt that they romanticise their use of the old computer; it's simply the only one that works with their older equipment. You say it's "easy to maintain" but they'd still need a specialist to diagnose & fix, you can't take it to any computer repair shop. And getting certain parts would be an absolute nightmare as well. You say "everyone using the system is familiar with it" well duh...the sky is also blue, of course people that use it are familiar with it, but for an industry that is on the decline, trying to get fresh faces in to revitalise won't be helped by a computer that those fresh faces would never have even seen before. Power usage doesn't matter when the looms probably pulls tens of kilowatts or more anyway. But yeah, it is cool. Impractical, but cool and that rings true for everything that they're doing, small & bespoke manufacturing of traditional wear.
It's unfortunate, but a lot of boutique industries like this are dying in Japan at the moment.
"don't use new tech if you don't have to"
and more a case of
"These are highly specialized weaving machines that were build decades ago around using punched cards, and whatever benefit by speedup in process we would get from replacing their ancient control system with a modern one, would be dwarfed by the cost of modifying them to use that control system."
Or to say this with slightly less words:
Replacing software and a couple of computers is cheap, compared to replacing room-sized industrial machinery.
Furthermore, it’s very common for factories to run older equipment because the cost of upgrading is higher, riskier, and shutting the factory down to do the upgrades comes with its own losses as well.
It’s also worth noting that there was also modern computers in that video too. The system they used to “digitally preview” what the weave would look like. But that is a separate system from the ones that interface with the weaving machines and thus very easy and cheap to upgrade.
This should be the top comment. Cost is a critical factor. I would also stop riding the bus and drive a Ferrari to work if that option costs as much as a bus ticket. As it doesn't then I'm going to stick with the bus, but this does not make it a superior choice.
I'm not saying that having latest or newest stuff is any better, just that using old stuff can bring some problems too.
In that scenario you need to find someone completely familiar with the old model of computer to break out the multimeter and oscilloscope. That's gonna be a huge pain.
And in the meantime none of their stuff works, though I suppose they can rest on the existing library of punch cards they most certainly have. Or do it manually again.
For non-electronic parts: that's why you have a machine shop.
The electrolyte isn't milk. It doesn't go off.
Put it this way, I've replaced maybe a dozen "bad caps" in equipment in 35 years of repairing high-end musical kit, six of which were in one 1970s synthesizer made from very cheap parts.
But, I've done very well out of the fashion for "re-capping" equipment because I charge 300 quid before I even start to consider clearing a spot on the bench for stuff that's been "re-capped" before they bring it to me to fix.
> The only components that can't sit forever on a shelf
From there it seems to have spread out into a "recap everything" craze that is just silly.
The real fault is an 0.1μF disc ceramic, one of those little brown ones, that's gone leaky and now thinks it's a 1k resistor. Not that you'd know, with all the other iatrogenic faults the damn thing now has.
Awful. Just awful. The "it was circuitbent so I tidied it all up" thing was a Prophet 600 that I had to write off, it was so badly damaged.
Maybe, maybe not. If the machine uses the right "legacy" parts (a Z80 is a great example, but so is anything belt- or gear-driven, etc.), then it's a very good bet those parts and the people who are familiar with them will remain available for much longer than you or I will be alive.
Just kidding, couldn't agree more with your observation. Not a Phone in sight.
> The Oxford English dictionary defines the word antecedent as a thing that existed before or precedes another. Precedent, on the other hand, is defined as an earlier event or action which serves as an example or guide.
__ __ _____
__╳__ _____
↑ ↑ ↑ ↑
[open] [closed]If you're not familiar with core memory, then look it up (it's cool). The industry borrowed a lot of women from the textiles industries to thread the tiny wires through the iron rings. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic-core_memory
Here's a video of a multi-story Jacquard loom. You can see the punch cards being fed up to the story above.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cB9pRRr_MvY
You can see the products that they make here:
and the intuition that halting production if a fault is detected in car manufacturing goes back to that experience.
and the offspring of that, the "Toyota production system" inspired lean. which inspired agile. and Kanban also is core of the TPS...
It took them a while to find the right business model, but now they partner with huge brands to offer them textile customization AT SCALE, which previously was pretty much unheard of. - https://www.unmade.com/
It may be worth mentioning that the tape storage of the Sharp MZ family of computers is exceptionally fast. E.g., transferring MP3 encoded media files won't do. This is also, why floppy disks were never a big thing on that platform, as tape was deemed good enough.
The Sharp MZ-80K (as indicated by its name powered by a Z80 microprocessor) was originally sold as a kit computer, but, unlike the more common variety, it came in larger pre-assemblies, like the entire monitor assembly, etc. (No soldering required.) Outside of Japan, it was usually sold fully assembled, often with RAM already populated to the full complement of 48KB.
I seem to remember the MZ-80A having a better keyboard. I don't know if I ever used one, or just saw pictures in computer magazines of the time.
BTW, I see that the machine in the video has kanji legends on the keyboard, which isn't found on the models that were sold in Europe. The latter feature upper and lower-case characters, which is switched by a special "SML/CAP" key (not the SHIFT key, which is for graphics characters!), a key that shows kanji markings on the domestic model. (So, I guess, the original, domestic model was Latin upper-case/kanji without lower-case?) Does anyone know more about this?
https://www.computinghistory.org.uk/userdata/images/large/53...
Is this the keyboard we're discussing? What I see is ortholinear, and with a spacebar that's a more reasonable size. If anything, we've largely regressed. Only keyboard enthusiasts have keyboards like this nowadays. Anything off the shelf has the same crap layout more or less now. Laptop and UMPC manufacturers don't care to innovate with the keyboard. (Except for the MNT Pocket Reform)
The keys can be a bit "squeaky", though, and, at times, I find the cursor keys annoying (which is due to training and muscle memory from other keyboards). I once wanted to quickly edit a Christmas themed image, using all those fancy graphics characters, and kept failing over the cursor keys all the time… :-)
But, yes, it could have been a fresh start all over. There were even a few alphabetically ordered ortholinear keyboards (especially on the pocket computer variety, since you wouldn't touch type on those anyway), as manufacturers thought this may be more accessible and mechanical constraints didn't apply anymore.
Also, worth a visit, the entire article at oldcomputr.com, showing the assembly with all the various components: https://www.oldcomputr.com/sharp-mz-80k-1978/ ! (This also mentions, "It’s a bit hard to get used to the keyboard." :-) )
I live by a different Japanese small town famous for its textile industry and there's at least one place still similarly using punch cards and tape. They exhibited some of it and a contemporary art piece made using it during the annual Fuji Textile Week last year.
Separately I also met an artist who's doing binary-hacked glitch embroidery and knitting with older machines in the area. I think they have stuff for sale from time to time and would be open for commissions. There's some pokemon/otaku/tech-related stuff if you dig through their insta.
Has that prevented them from advancing as a society? No. Has that prevented new innovations? Certainly not. This has likely prevented a lot of devices from being decommissioned and adding to our recycling woes and landfill. For contrast, a typical North American company refreshes all computers every 3 years. Imagine that.
I am sure that where it matters, companies are using newer tooling, but where the benefits are minuscule - there’s no pressure to change. Japanese people can take comfort in knowing their favourite hardware will be supported for a very long time.
In North America, we are largely driven by monetary benefits. Everything is done to optimize profits, that eventually translates to a fatter paycheque for the CEO. That thinking trickles down. There’s only one hard rule, don’t break any laws. Everything else is game.
At the very bottom, you generally have people that have been marginalized. The society has written them off. They work many jobs to merely survive. I’ll save more on that for another day.
In comparison, Japanese society is driven by honour. Executives are less likely to take decisions solely for generating demand, through innovative marketing or trickery. People work their entire lives for the same company - that looks after them. The proverbial “salaryman”.
This kind of motivation creates more clarity on the end goal/purpose, which leads to more innovation. When you’re not chasing the golden goose and are driven by honour/respect, you’re more likely to be focused on the customer and what’s truly in their best interest. Some NA companies do this too - but it’s not a trait we particularly value above all else and is far far from being the norm.
The genuine concern for another being, even in business, is embedded in Japanese culture. Whether it’s being on time, or masking when you’re sick to protect others around you. Truly fascinating and admirable (though not without trad-offs).
I found the part about companies looking after the employee really interesting.
Having worked entirely in Europe, I've found most managers screwing over subordinates. I've encountered plenty of bully managers, never one who seemed to genuinely care.
https://www.kalzumeus.com/2014/11/07/doing-business-in-japan...
Not that there isn't some general truth to what they're saying, but it's definitely the rose-tinted glasses 'how it should work' view of Japanese corporate culture.
I agree, but those are interesting examples because they're not unique to Japanese culture. Fax machines common enough in the US for them to be continue to be useful, and I see more and more people using flip phones as time goes by.
Excluding totalitarian communist monarchies, the Japanese are, human-capital adjusted, about the least productive people on earth. So they are not actually "focusing on the problem".
> Has that prevented them from advancing as a society? No.
The US pumped out a number of popular and populist movies and books in the 80ies and 90ies that betray a real fear of being overtaken by Japan. The notion seems completely ridiculous nowadays, and a glance of the GDP development of both countries over the last four decades will immediately make clear why.
> Has that prevented new innovations? Certainly not.
So what important innovations have come out of Japan in the last 40 years?
Japan has a lot of admirable qualities, but a pragmatic focus on productivity and innovation is not one of them.
https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?QueryId=107229
Human Capital (let's take Pisa scores as a proxy):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Programme_for_International_St...
GDP growth, JPN vs US
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/national-gdp-constant-usd...
(Worth pointing out that the US population has grown by ~1/3 whilst Japan has remained about constant, so per capita the effect is not as pronounced)
Great example: https://youtu.be/Km6bFBSVty4?t=74
https://www.pastposters.com/details.php?prodId=4514 https://filmandfurniture.com/2014/09/blade-runner-design-whi...
Books: Neuromancer etc.
Good compilation:
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/JapanTakesOverTh...
Stepping back... having higher "productivity" or "GDP growth" does not make a cut-and-dry "winner". Everything is a trade-off.
OK, so what's the upside to working almost twice as long to achieve the same output as an American? Doesn't seem to be happiness, because Japan seems to score a good deal lower there as well, and that's after GDP adjustment:
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/gdp-vs-happiness?country=...
As I said, I'm aware of plenty of metrics that Japan does significantly better than the US on, but I'd like to see one that's linked to low productivity and low growth.
By the way, did you know that (some) modern looms use jets of air/water to send the weft thread across the loom? No more shuttles or mechanical passing of the thread. Amazing.
If you ever find yourself in that part of the world, I highly recommend visiting the textile pavilion there. They basically show you 1000x throughput improvement developed over the course of a century, demonstrated in about an hour.
Also, I have always felt that people who design industrial automation machines are mad geniuses. They just seem so complex but work!
I wouldn't change a thing, except the stuffing - it's a winter garment, so I would stuff it with wool instead of cotton, though that was of course not an option in the Edo period and still hardly is, in Japan.
It also depends on the price point you want to hit. Cotton is much less expensive than wool.
The thing about wool is that it insulates even when it's damp, while cotton simply collapses as far as insulation is concerned unless it's completely dry.
In any case, my point really is that the right material to use in production depends on what your target market is. If you're aiming to sell at a more affluent crowd, then wool all the way! But you might also be aiming to sell at a larger, less affluent group that makes wool the wrong material due to its cost.
There's no absolute right or wrong here, only what's right or wrong for the market you're trying to address.
It's been a while, but if I recall correctly, they mentioned that sheep farmers in New Zealand were having trouble making money and finding uses of wool. (I might be misremembering, as I'd have to go back and re-listen.) And if anything on Clarkson's Farm is to be taken as an accurate portrayal of farming trends, sheep farming was portrayed as a very difficult and unprofitable business. So I am completely guessing here, but maybe sheep farming is just not popular like it was?
Sheep farming being on the decline, at least in the U.S., seems to be at least corroborated by the following after a quick search:
https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/animal-products/sheep-lamb-m...
https://www.kunc.org/business/2013-10-09/the-long-slow-decli...
According to this article though, Japan is the third biggest importer of wool but only had 20,000 sheep, as of the article's date of 2014: https://www.fragmentsmag.com/en/2014/06/ami-tsumuli-4/. So maybe in Japan, it's both an expensive enterprise to farm sheep and a lot of competition with imports. But that really doesn't answer why it wouldn't be used, which doesn't seem accurate if they're one of the world's top importers of wool, only behind the U.S. and China.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cassette_tape#21st_century
Vinyl and tape are also enjoyably tactile.
Indie acts have often gravitated towards CD-R rather than vinyl, because they can burn them at home in small quantities. But for mobile use, a walkman actually beats a discman, in my opinion, due to its smaller size. And, not being digital, cassettes have a kind of built-in "soft" DRM feature, in that reproduction is possible but goes hand-in-hand with a loss in quality. The mixtape / pirating / bootlegging scene helps spread the message about an act, and, if someone truly likes the music, they might go back to the original artist and buy an "official" prerecorded cassette where they get better sound quality, and a reasonable level of expectation that the money actually reaches the artist to support them.
With Spotify, for example, I have no idea, as a consumer, if I listen to a lot of small acts, how much of the money I pay every month to Spotify actually gets into the pockets of those acts, or whether they're just on there because they got arm-twisted into being on the platform because of platform power.
There's a lot that's good about the medium, and that goodness comes in the form of simplicity in engineering, which is a virtue in its own right.
You can assume it is pretty much a rounding error what they get.
I end up with the music, the musician ends up with most of the money, everybody wins.
Not just reproduction. Even just listening to them a bunch goes hand-in-hand with a loss in quality. Unplanned obsolescence?
The physical properties of tape make it much better for socializing than digital files or streaming services because it forces in-person interaction. That's what people were actually enjoying throughout the 20th century, we all just lived in a collective fantasy that it was music that people were after when it wasn't quite that after all.
I remember watching TV shows in the 90s and discussing each episode with friends. It was great.
Or you could rent a video movie and watch it with friends (amortising the cost).
Mix tapes were also great gifts.
I dunno, the tech was technically inferior but it just worked out nice somehow.
At school, me and my bestie at the time would quiz each other on the previous night's episode of Star Trek. How lame we were :]
I recognize, in hindsight only, that every woman I'd dated seriously has received a mix tape from me. Well, in the old days it was a mix tape. These days it's more likely to be a CD or a thumb drive. But it's the same thing in the end.
I think it's a way of revealing a more intimate part of myself. Kind of "you should know who I am, and here is an important part of that" kind of thing.
In visual arts I think there is longer tradition of playing with the imperfections of the media instead of trying to hide them.
But ultimately, trying to reason about art has its limits, not everything can be understood (or at least enjoyed) rationally.
Cassette tape also have that crispy, muffed but hot and softly saturated sound. I also like sometimes to record my synthesizers direct to tape with a Yamaha MX4T (a 4-track cassette recorder).
For some genres that's the point. Most modern black metal is released on cassette tape, to achieve the desired black metal sound.
While I don't miss cassettes I do miss the rituals surrounding physical media. Being able to pick a thing, listen to it, and not being sold on other items.
They have a tour that shows you the full evolution of the loom technology including one operating by punch cards.
I had no idea until I visited the museum shortly before COVID
I don't know the specific requirements for kimono fabrics, but I suspect there are. Accordingly, they use special weaving machines. These machines are clearly made to order in extremely limited quantities. Tape cassettes and punched tapes are attributes of the control subsystem of these machines.
For fabric design, they use Photoshop (is it like Photoshop?) and a completely modern PC.
That is, they do everything right and in the right way. There is no point in changing machines if the machines are doing their job, especially if they are doing their job according to unique requirements.
Upgrading this system just for the sake of upgrading will either bankrupt the company or lead to the creation of something completely different that is clearly not wanted by consumers.
But here's what's really interesting - what heads are in their tape recorders and what kind of tape do they use in cassettes, that all this can withstand the production cycle? This is really impressive.
This channel (Byte Attic) have a restoration video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NiAL5LCQ7Ds
https://www.old-computers.com/museum/computer.asp?c=174
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharp_MZ
Edit, regarding the video: It should be mentioned that the parts found in late 1970s and early 1980s computers were usually of quite good quality (things like capacitors were also more expensive then) and modern parts are not necessarily better or more reliable. "Shotgunning" all capacitors doesn't necessarily improve things. E.g., mine works perfectly fine without changing a single part. This particular machine, shown in the video, was in a bit of a rough state, though.
Telegrams? Is this some kind of joke? I've never seen anything resembling a telegram here.
Faxes are still used between businesses, which is much the same as the US where they're ubiquitous in the real estate and legal industries.
They're used for special occasions, you can even get them printed on pretty paper and put in pretty envelopes.
https://www.ntt-east.co.jp/dmail/
Wedding and funeral ceremonies often include a segment where someone reads aloud messages that have been delivered by telegram.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-japan-...
Japanese are not lazy, they are one of the most capable people on the planet, but that also means they don't innovate or see the value of new inventions.
A great example is that in the west, we have specific kitchen tools for everything. An apple peeler, for example. Specifically to peel and only peel apples and only apples. Why? Because everyone's a lazy bastard.
But in Japan? One kitchen knife for everything. Yes, one single kitchen knife. For everything. Why? Because everyone is skilled with the kitchen knife to do anything and everything with it, so they don't need to innovate and invent apple peelers.
Or another great example: Japan started using telephones and then mobile phones and that was good enough for them. The west wanted even more convenience and invented smartphones.
As you put it, doing it the old fashioned way is "good enough" for Japan because they aren't lazy. They are both among the most advanced and regressive people on the planet.
Also this article mentions that the chef of the restaurant in the Japan House in London: “Akira has used many different types of knives in the past, but these days he finds that one sturdy knife and one small petit knife are enough to prepare almost any Japanese dish.”
So I’m not sure where you information is coming from but sounds more like myth than fact.
Article: https://www.japanhouselondon.uk/discover/japanese-knives-par...
You're probably right, but the actual software in only a small part of the process here. People have to go and manually cut the punch cards once produced for example, so it turns into an extremely slow and inefficient process overall.
That said, would they benefit from a years-long, 10 times over budget and bug riddled software renewal? Probably not.
Give it another decade or two and fax machines will be gone.
Tape is fine too but it is risky because factory may stop creating tape.
And was this editorialized from the original?
...
A computer from 40 years ago is still in use! A Japanese factory that makes hanten while preserving tradition with machines and handwork
I would imagine this kind of thing is tucked away in small shops all across the country.
Its incredible how these machines achieve so much with <64MHz CPUs
I also remember a discussion here about a camp site that was still using a booking system on an eighties computer, but couldn't find it.
Except Yamaha. Yamaha is just weird.
Anyway, the result was that Japan's biggest supplier of tomato soup was...
Sony.
IMHO they outrank anything as all-round pencils - I mostly use mine in H grade for writing, occasionally bringing out a set of various grades for some drawing, but still - Hi-Unis are unbreakable, consistent, takes kindly to erasing mistakes and... Wow, beating Tombows, Blackwings, Lumographs, the works. IMHO, at least. YMMV. Terms&Conditions apply.
"Yamaha CEO Pleased With Current Production Of Jet Skis, Alto Saxophones, Snowmobiles, Power Generators, Scooters, Golf Carts"
That culture is actually starting to change, because that domestic rivalry/hostility has been the chief reason Japan lost the competition against American, South Korean, Taiwanese, and Chinese manufacturers in recent decades.
Can't fight on the world stage if you're busy fighting each other on home turf, y'know?
> In 1909, Michio Suzuki (1887–1982) founded the Suzuki Loom Works in the small seacoast village of Hamamatsu, Japan. Business boomed as Suzuki built weaving looms for Japan's giant silk industry. In 1929, Michio Suzuki invented a new type of weaving machine, which was exported overseas. The company's first 30 years focused on the development and production of these machines.
Not only is it the same company, but it started out as a loom company!
That being said, Suzuki Motor Corporation is actually a fairly small company (market cap ~$18.5B) that mainly sticks to building automobiles. Not to be confused with something like the Mitsubishi Group that provides a wide range of different products and services (automobiles, banking, home appliances, etc) under the same brand logo [2].
This is not just a one off, as we know - Japan is still a heavy (the only?) user of floppy disks and fax machines.
Sometimes traditions need to be revisited - and then retired.
I have a server that's even older than that in my home network. Why? Because it continues to do its job well. The cost (in time) and risk of of swapping it out for newer hardware makes doing so the less appealing choice.
Interesting. I wonder if non-tape- based things are any more efficient, or is the z80 based system peak-tech for weaving.
STM32 for real time control and a Linux SoM for GUI/database is a pretty common pattern used for industrial control these days.
Some problems don't need to be refactored, re-implemented, upgraded, and put in the cloud with a handy mobile app for your convenience.
Maybe they should replace the computer and cassettes before they run of out them.
What value would that provide (than make-work for a couple of software engineers)?
Probably the most bang-for-the-buck effort would be get their existing software running on an emulator, and get that integrated with the hole-punch machine. An even then, I think the main value there would be to have a backup in hand if they have trouble maintaining that old computer hardware.
But nowadays, it would probably be an agile disaster with two or three layers of managers and sales people, maybe even on different firms, if done by best practice, between you and the customer. Forget talking to the operators.
KISS is a beauty of the past.
There is no way the simple and straightforward text based solution would be made. It is more likely it would be a bloated mess with clouds or what not.
That's a weird way of putting it, but I honestly think the "modernize" all the things crowd are probably the ones that "sound indoctrinated."
So, if your "different worldview" says reflexively redeveloping the software would provide "a lot of value," then name the value it would provide. They've got a process that's worked for them for 40+ years, what exactly is the value in re-doing software that's only a minor part of that process? Does that "value" justify the cost?
Honestly, what they've got can probably be understood more as an appliance than as an IT system, and anything developed today would almost certainly take the form of an IT system, with all the recurring cost and complexity that entails.
It's a difficult thing to quantify, but access to stable supply lines is surely worth more than zero.
If you replaced the input with USB or similar, you now also need someone with IT skills if that part goes wrong.
In the lingo, business continuity and risk management. When, not if but when, the current system fails, there is high chance of it being unrecoverable. Even if it were technically recoverable, can they find someone to do that work? How long will the factory stand still while the system is being recovered or replaced? In general it is more cost-effective to replace things before they fail rather than after the fact. Doubly so in these sort of cases where using the old system (in working state!) as a reference would most likely be beneficial.
The only thing I can think of that would make their current setup more robust would be having the program burned into ROM and not on tape.
I mean, probably any UNIX program written in C? Bill Joy vi can run on modern computers. What makes this software substantially different than a text editor?
Compiling pre-ANSI-C and pre-POSIX codebases might have challenges, but standardization has really gotten us lot of stability here.
I'd expect conservatively written C99/POSIX code to be usable certainly for another 20 years, there is just so much inertia there
If it ain't broke, don't fix it!
Its far from the only thing that they constantly change too
Oh, but wait, don't tell me; they actually go outside. LOL!
Japan is an interesting mix of old and new.