Are shills misinformation adjacent in some way? It's interesting to see activists listed as potential shills, though they don't clearly explain the body of evidence that aligns activists as potentially harmful. An activist can be a shill but I'm not sold that they're all bad, but I've definitely run into a good number of activists who border so far on not knowing what they're talking about or how to talk about it that they're essentially harmful to either information quality or discourse among regular people.