Also, women generally have a larger friend group than men and their friends are more encouraged to stage interventions if their lives are spinning out of control than men.
> Also, women generally have a larger friend group than men and their friends are more encouraged to stage interventions if their lives are spinning out of control than men.
This is a nonsense argument even if the premise may be true. This, in no way, makes the harm ok.
These effects are not taken seriously/acknowledged by the vast majority of medical professionals, so I don't see how it is relevant to whether the pills have to be prescribed. It is a separate issue.
People should be free to make their own choice without going through a gatekeeper who adds no value. Most often, women making the choices are more informed (by their social network) of the wide range of potential side effects than their doctor is, who may or may not have a uterus and may or may not take reports of side effects seriously.
This is what is so baffling about so many of the ridiculous comments here. It's so disturbingly common for doctors to ignore bad individual interactions and just call women dramatic. It's shockingly hard to find anyone who will even so much as listen. Prescribers will throw some random BC pill at you and if it doesn't work for you, tough, try your luck with another doctor/NP. The system doesn't provide any protection, it frankly just makes it worse.
Most women I've spoken to about it have had bad experiences with at least one hormonal birth control, especially in mood, appetite, sex drive, energy levels, depression & anxiety, fitness, bleeding. The range of things hormones can affect is wide and sometimes subtle. There are dozens of different formulations and a lot of women are very particular about the one they take, having found one with tolerable side effects.
IUDs have a similar range of experiences too, though they're less popular so I hear less about them.