Hacker News Reader

Comment by roschdal | Hacker News Reader

Or Arduino making a new board with an MMU which will run Linux

Did you read that article? It literally says it’s impossible to run Linux without hundreds of megabytes of additional RAM, which Arduinos wouldn’t have and some boards can’t even be upgraded (eg https://arduino.stackexchange.com/questions/28794/how-to-exp...).

As you said, cLinux exists - so if you want Linux on an embedded device you can have it. Just not on an Arduino (or at least not on any models I’ve used).

Early Linux distros used to run on very small machines with about 4 megabytes of RAM (if you were lucky enough to have one that big!) I used to run Slackware 2-point-something, or maybe it was 3-point-something around 1993-1994 on a Toshiba T5200. (LATER: It was Slackware 2.01 on a CD from InfoMagic.)

IIRC, the critical factor was a CPU that was capable of multi-tasking. In the x86 world, that was a 386 or better.

Linux today is very different from what it was like back then though.

Absolutely. I can remember running a full-blown UNIX in 70 megabytes of hard drive. Try doing that today. <grin>

But who knows whether some version of Linux can't be run on an Arduino if that Linux version can be cut down enough?

There were some versions of Linux that used to fit on a couple of floppies, or maybe even just one floppy. Or am I thinking of something similar like QNX?

A floppy disk is also larger than the memory on an Arduino.

The Due, for example, has the following specs:

> 96KB SRAM, 512KB flash

Source: https://docs.arduino.cc/hardware/due

(And that’s one of the beefier boards!)

<grin>

Back in the early 8-bit days, any RAM greater than 64K and disk-based storage more than about 100K was 'looxery,lad!'.

I grew up on them machines as well (plus ones with less than 64K too). I still have my Amstrad CPC 464 plugged in :)

Those machines also famously couldn’t run anything more powerful than CP/M. Let alone something as heavy as Linux.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com