Skinny and bombshell are different. Even a bombshell model that is skinny is curvy and not the kind of neotenous androgynous ideal I referred to. You missed the point and clearly don't understand the significance of the difference.
> If everything I say is logically correct and everything you say has issues with correctness, then who's the ignorant one?
It doesn't matter if what you say appears to be logically correct to you because it's overfitted to a small subset of history that makes sense to you and actually falls apart under a larger evolutionary timeline. Thank you for proving my point.
You don't actually grapple with divergent local evolutionary pressures creating different, competing and often conflicting ideals of feminine beauty each of which make sense for a given evolutionary context, because it's easier to be intellectually lazy than to actually build a model that accounts for that evidence.
Who's the ignorant one? The one who continues to ignore full evolutionary context, so still you.