> I don't know if it's unique to Europe, but I am never working for a non tech-first company again.
For what it's worth, Goldman Sachs is reasonably competent in tech, and used to be even more so (at least in relative terms).
Bloomberg is about half-way between the banks and the more competent tech companies.
(I worked at both, and a few other financial companies and also at Google, Facebook etc.)
It's so bad that they're losing serious business on this despite being competitive on fees and service.
Bloomberg is great if you're big and bring a lot of money to the table. For any small/mid-size firm (think less than 5M ARR on Bloomberg licenses) the answer for even basic requests is often "we'll file an enhancement request" only for things to disappear and never get adjusted. To give an example, it's still not possible to get an hourly export of the trade history in CSV or XML on a SFTP server. There's workarounds but it's definitely not half-way competent.
I last worked there in 2018. So my experience is a bit out-of-date.
> Bloomberg is great if you're big and bring a lot of money to the table.
My experience is from working inside of Bloomberg and trying to get stuff done. I don't know how it looks like from the outside.
Though I can tell you that eg Google was more competent on the inside when I was working there (in 2014 to 2016); but from the outside they are probably not easier to work with than Bloomberg?
In Europe, tech is seen as "just IT" especially in non tech corporations. It's much less important than in the US.
It's a pretty minor thing but personally I think just the fact that I rarely see the distinction between "software engineering/development" and "IT" in Europe is pretty telling.
The salaries are also another indicator.