Hacker News Reader

I’ve fed chatGPT the specs for some toy languages that it didn’t know and it generated code in them no problem but did a lot of filling in the blanks for what it thought would be in the standard libs.

Something more interesting to think about is what would a programming language designed FOR llms to use look like?

View on HN

Would that be good feedback then? To implement those features into the library because ChatGPT expecting to be able to use them may be akin to it expecting a human to likely use them. Or not really?

In most cases it made perfect sense. One joke language had no for loop by design, and just a while type loop and chatGPT invented a for loop, but when I told it to stick only to the spec it completed the problems without an issue.

When web browsing was enabled it was able to learn these by itself.

English, of course. really, really clear English.

No, then we’d need to write an English compiler, I’m talking about an output language.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com