That overview seemed to be more about what exact methodology future studies should use. The Nature article had more of an overview than that.
I was looking for something, anything, that would tell me if there's significant research in the area and if simple procedures that could be carried out using this kit would work.
(Also you might note that the Nature article was linked 9 hours after my post :) In some ways it does give a better overview of the technique, I'd link it if I had found it.)