I spent most of a day there and there were very few people in most of the exhibits, which was really nice. I got to take my time to enjoy the pieces I got to see.
I did stop by the Mona Lisa just to say I'd been there, and the crowd around it was really stupid. There are dozens, if not hundreds of much more interesting paintings in the same room and the hallway beyond.
I didn't note the name of the painting, but hanging directly opposite the Mona Lisa was a gigantic painting, probably ten feet high and twenty across. Absolutely full of exquisite details. Not a single person paid it any attention.
I genuinely don't get it.
> I genuinely don't get it.
Being snobbish about the behaviour or the masses is less tenable when you are doing the same thing as them.
I read an interesting article a few days ago about how, due to the smartphone and social media, ordinary people today are basically living like they are performers on TV. When everything they do is focused on performance, there’s less time or interest in contemplatively examining art. The quality of those lesser-known works might matter to you, me, or some others here on HN. But does it matter to enough people now to put any dent in overtourism of the über-famous works?
(: