> Stress is all about perception.
No, stress is actually physiological. What your saying is limited to specific sources of stress.
No, stress is actually physiological. What your saying is limited to specific sources of stress.
There is no such thing as an external source of stress. You can't measure how much stress an object or situation is objectively emitting, because it is a response generated by the mind itself.
As such it can only be examined by the mind itself, and with that it can be mastered.
The unconscious is the mind too.
Body and mind are interdependent, without mind the body would be dead.
No, I think this is meaningless. What you're refering to is the brain. Positing a subcoscious mind adds nothing to the explanatory model since everything this supposed entity does is already done by the brain and pretty well understood at that. Occam's razor. You're stuck in old Cartesian metaphysics (dualism and parallelism) which has been superceded by better scientific undetstandings for quite a while now.
Dualism is proposing that there is a clear division between mind and body, which is your original claim that I'm debating.
You're making a division between mind and body, stating that stress can occur without the mind.