At this point, in light of all of this evidence comprehensively laid out in relatively plain English, supporting or minimize what Trump has done (and attempted to do) is an admission of extreme ignorance, or malice.
[1] https://www.washingtonpost.com/documents/8a7503af-fde7-4061-...
At this point the Democratic establishment has a history of frivolous use of law to attack Trump. That indictment basically admits in point 3 that it is on shaky ground. The Democrats had their chance to hit Trump with the Russiagate investigation and came up with nothing. Then they started impeaching him to try and stop Biden's Ukraine dealings from coming to light. In light of that it seems unlikely that these lawsuits will prove serious allegations, even if they manage to get a lucky judge/jury combo and score a conviction.
It is naked politics.
If you read the Mueller Report it's also clear the the "Russiagate" wasn't a hoax and this argument that the "Democrats had their chance to hit Trump" as if the fact that the impeachments clearly failed on a partisan basis and Barr misrepresented the findings in the Mueller Report, which were damning and would have been worth an indictment if not for the fact of Trump being the sitting President at the time.
If you hate the American system and think the current liberal democracy deserves to be destroyed (for whatever reason) then you can just say so without pretending that Trump isn't a uniquely malignant liar beyond precedent.
In America or not in America, governments are either resistant enough to military or political coups or not, when they occur. There's nothing special about the paper in the US Constitution that changes human behavior.
I happen to think the lives wasted in Iraq FAR outweigh the reminder that Trump provided, reinforcing the waning belief that the US Government structures are still worth supporting.