I don't know why I see this type of invalid speculation so often. The author already responded that they reviewed the script and didn't post any sensitive data, so won't add more to that.

I'd just state that tons of us use ChatGPT effectively and never blindly trust the outputs - for me ChatGPT is a starting point, not the final product. We're not all so daft as that lawyer who cut and pasted hallucinated case references into a legal brief without verifying them first.