My favorite Vim oneliners for text manipulation
muhammadraza.me
muhammadraza.me
It's just so unintuitive and trying to teach it in a "here are some good shortcuts that will save you time" way was a near-total waste.
vim is the closest any editor comes to interfacing directly with my brain. Once you learn to make your neurons fire in the right way to move the cursor to the right spot, it's easy and there's no better way to edit code. Describing the neuron firing order to someone else, though, is futile.
It's like learning to to use your fingers to pick something up for the first time as a kid: you just have to try enough times until it sticks.
It's funny you mention that. Just today, I had this moment where I realized that if someone asked me which key letters are used to move up/down/left/right, I'd have to pause and think about it.
I've been using Vim for years. Like, my index finger rests on the down key, so J is down. I think? And so on... My middle finger rests on the up key, so K goes up? Do I actually have to move my index finger to go left? What is my pinky doing most of the time?
It's just funny how all this stuff is burned into my brain but I wouldn't even be able to tell someone the basics without a keyboard in front of me.
> The use of the HJKL keys for moving the cursor in the vi editor and its descendants originated from the ADM-3A [...] The ←, ↓, ↑, → and Home labels printed on the H, J, K, L, and ~ ^ keys were a visual reference to the control characters Ctrl+H, Ctrl+J, Ctrl+K, Ctrl+L, and Ctrl+~ ^ that were required to move the cursor left, down, up, right, and to the top/left corner (or "Home" position) of the terminal, respectively [...] The Ctrl+H and Ctrl+J functions were the standard ASCII backspace and line feed respectively, but the interpretations of Ctrl+K, Ctrl+L, and Ctrl+~ ^ were new to the ADM-3A.
Seems almost a happy accident. I personally like the placement because the most common movement in a document is down and it's placed right under the most dextrous finger, the index finger, by a coincidence between ASCII encoding and the QWERTY layout. Up being the second most common movement was put under the second most dextrous finger. Nice.
(j = downarrow was a mnemonic I used while learning vim.)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ADM-3A#/media/File:KB_Terminal...
I knew a developer who had one.
Nope, j is down. J combines the current line with the next line, reducing whitespace between to 1 space.
Back when I first figured out what J was doing (having typo'd it regularly) I thought it was useless, then one day I just started reflexively using it when manipulating function arguments.
Likewise, k is up, K looks up the word under the cursor in a man page.
And so J stands for Join (the next line to the current line), IIRC.
H = the leftmost key, so left L = the rightmost key, so right J = jeet (yeet), so down K = klimb (climb), so up
I look forward to the day this is just burned into my subconscious, but until then, this works I suppose
Does the analogy hold for ^M which is carriage return?
Anyway, I remember that stuff. Had a lot of "fun" on Unixes back in the day using things like ^J, ^M, ^H, stty sane, stty -a, stty icrnl, stty onlcr (or is it the other way around), fiddling with termcap and terminfo, and much more ...
When I first switched to Colemak, around 2010, I remapped the movement keys so that they were in the same physical location as hjkl on qwerty.
Then I realised I'd lost compatibility with other readline based software. So I just learned to use the new, not particularly ergonomic, positions under Colemak.
At this point it's almost always from muscle memory now and couldn't tell you what I press half the time.
Vim is like the Great Glass Elevator, it has a button for moving in every direction and using it since the 90s has been like learning to play a musical instrument.
Actually vim is more like the Great Glass Elevator cum Excavator, because it has buttons and levers (to extend your simile) for moving in every direction and performing operations of every kind, and most importantly, all sorts of combinations of the two:
>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37018215
So, if tomorrow, either more movements or more operations were added to vim, they would automatically play well with the older ones.
This is orthogonality (1), and genius, IMO :)
(1) As they mean in microprocessor ISA design (, I think, not being a hardware guy, but have just read about it a little here and there, while doing assembly language programming years ago).
vim is like the Great Glass Elevator, if the Great Glass Elevator was modal
I've had the same PIN code for over 20 years.
To know what modal editing is and understand that first is going to help - but then your learning session is over like that without teaching any "tricks".
And "vim" is pretty close to "vm" for virtual machine that runs that vimcode, or bytecode :)
You don't need to pick up a lot of keybinds in order to be fairly productive at text editing in vim.
The extra stuff will just make you more productive, maybe asymptomatically.
Heh, dang autocorrect or me, not sure.
I meant asymptotically.
Lunch is !work for me.
Also, in the GUI version of vim you have scrollbars, toolbar, and the standard keyboard shortcuts work, too. So you can use it like any other editor.
It makes keybindings in vim discoverable, it's quite magical. For example, press g and get a table of all the various commands that follow from there. Press mapleader and get a table of various commands from there, etc.
Edit: On closer look, I've learned that maybe vim-which-key came before that, and guide-key before that etc, there's a long lineage of this too!
> :%s/\w\+/\=submatch(0)+1/g | echo line('$')
Yeah, no. Isn't there a plugin to just display word count in the corner somewhere automatically?
You can add it to your statusline (or tabline, ruler) with the wordcount() function:
:let &statusline ..= ' words: %{wordcount().words}'
---Aside: that "one-liner" doesn't "count the words in the file" at all? It just replaces all words with "1" and echos the last line number. I'm confused because this seems so wrong that I may be missing something? Unless the "67 substitutions on 5 lines" message is intended as the "word count", in which case I submit that 1) this is the ugliest thing I've ever seen, and 2) the author of this article doesn't know Vim all that well (there are so many better/easier ways to do this).
Others have commented on built-in vim functionality for counting words, but assuming the author copy-pasted a similar looking command, they may have intended something like:
:%s/\w\+//gn
Knowing that the n flag will return a count instead of doing the substitute may be useful to know, but I personally don't need a search count very often.Knowing that you can execute a vimscript expression on each search match using \= is also cool and I was unaware of such functionality. https://vimhelp.org/change.txt.html#sub-replace-expression
Did you try it? Because that's not what it does. submatch(0) expands to the first submatch, which is the entire thing that's matched, and +1 adds 1 to this, which will a;ways result in "1" here since any string that doesn't start with a digit will be type-coerced to 0.
Anyway, /n being intended sounds likely; I forgot that would report the number of matches. Still very odd how that got morphed to what's in the article.
Yes
> Because that's not what it does. [...]
I don't see how your description significantly differs from my description.
Insanity described in that post.
:%!wcThat said, I do use vi bindings for navigation. Stuff like "replace all instances of X with Y" are semantic, and my editor handles them for me. Doing "insert at the end of this quoted string is something I _do_ use. I have gripes with Vi's defaults (hjkl shouldn't be the default because the author had a keyboard with those defaults half a century ago), but overall it's an improvement on arrow keys and a mouse. The best comparison to me is it's like touch typing Vs hunt and peck typing for text editing. I'm not wildly more productive because I can use a handful of shortcuts, but it does remove friction.
What I do want is semantic vim. I spend my day writing code, and despite the fact that I edit text I think in semantics. No, I probably don't care what the next word is, and I don't care to guess how vim is going to interpret `w` when I give it:
macro_rules! foo {
($l:tt) => { bar!($l); }
}
macro_rules! bar {
(3) => {}
}
foo!(3);
What I really want is something that interacts with tree sitter (or the likes) and navigates my code. I want to delete this current block, or this function. I want to jump to the next argument, not the comma in a hard coded string. I want change the last argument of this function, not up until the closing bracket of the first function call in foo(bar(), baz(), 3);Text editing is powerful but it is definitely not a seamless interface to my brain when I have to think of how to map what I want to do (eg delete a function) to how I can do it given the specific layout of the text (delete the indentation level with daI but the signature was over several lines so I need a few extra dd).
https://github.com/nvim-treesitter/nvim-treesitter-textobjec...
See the start of my original comment for why I don't want to use neovim (Im not spending hours configuring plugins and choosing between three subtly different LSP and treesitter plugins, then choosing a client and server for each). Setting that up involves (first changing editors), learning the details of my editors scripting language, the details of tree sitter, and coming up with a unique set of bindings that don't conflict with neovim's - no thanks.
hjkl are still a pretty good choice for a modal editor. If you’ve learnt standard touch typing, your right hand will be resting on jkl;, so it’s extremely convenient.
The Vi(m) philosophy is to reduce how much you have to move your hands about, so everything is put as close to the “home row” (asdf + jkl;) as possible.
This is why Vim-spinoffs like Helix and Kakoune, while turning the whole keybinding system on its head, are both keeping hjkl. Not for historical legacy, but because it’s actually a good choice.
> This is why Vim-spinoffs like Helix and Kakoune, while turning the whole keybinding system on its head, are both keeping hjkl. Not for historical legacy, but because it’s actually a good choice.
I had a look this morning and I couldn't find anything to back this claim up. My claim would be it's the opposite, it's what the authors are used to, it reduces friction for other people who might change, but it's objectively inferior than having the keys be the same as the home row keys themselves.
"Your problem with vim is that you don't grok vi:"
So in that sense calling python is very much a "vim one liner".
Putting VIM in that blog post is unnecessary and I do believe it was posted with bad intentions.
I don't believe article would land on main page if it would not have VIM and it would be only about text editing one liners. Especially when those one liners are not amusing.
s/^$/printf("@%d\\n", __LINE__);
To place a line printf on every empty line in the program, to quickly find out where your code crashes on the next run.
Obviates most of my need for external debuggers, and works over serial lines etc where setting up a debugger is going to be a hassle or simply not possible.
:%s/^printf("@%d\\n", __LINE__);$//Would this be better?
s/^$/printf("@%d\\n", __LINE__);@
:s/.*/printf("& -- %d\\n", __LINE__); &
This only works on lines that don't have string literals and behaves badly on lines that span block boundaries.I had confused @ and &
#define DEBUG_PRINT(stmt) printf(#stmt“ — %d\n”, __LINE__)
Then your replacement could be something like:
s/.*/DEBUG_PRINT(&); &;Which would print out the statement being executed and the line it is at in the program.
Also you’ll want :%s instead of :s, as the latter will only replace on the line on which the cursor is positioned.
Come to think of it, you’ll probably not want this to happen on lines which are themselves preprocessor directives or those with comments, function signatures, or (exclusively) punctuation like with braces. All this to say, I’m sure it could be done, but it gets into the weeds very quickly.
Which I think is a good habit to have anyway. Some people use comments without preceding empty lines (oh why) to delineate code, so they'd have to change the regex a bit to make this work.
:g/\(\d\{1,3}\.\)\{3}\d\{1,3\}/y A
Is there a way to type "ip" and select from a helper list with regex and description sorted by frecency?
I‘ve been viming for 10+ y and just using the normal shortcuts and ways of manipulating text is a major productivity gain.
also, a nit pick, if you use Magic mode (\v), that pattern gets way better:
:g/\v(\d{1,3}\.){3}\d{1,3}/y A
Also, it's not just fmt you can use. Want to sort a paragraph of lines? !}sort^M and you're done. Or reverse sort till the end of the file with !Gsort -r^M etc.
Really, all UNIX commands are integrated into your editor, and that's the beauty of it.
Right. Or flip the case of a section of text, even of an arbitrary block of lines demarcated by marks set by vi(m) commands like ma and mb and the like, by filtering it through tr.
Or filter another section through sed or awk or even through a Unix pipeline, to do whatever you want.
And with just a little practice, you can become fluent and fast with all of this, and it improves your productivity a lot, apart from being fun and creative.
:h 'wrap'I believe I've used a similar 'delete empty lines command' in the past, but it was just:
:g/^$/d
Can someone explain what the OP's regex is doing differently?Edit to be more helpful:
^ is the start of a line
\s is a space character
* means "zero or more of the previous character"
$ is the end of a line
> :%s/\w\+/\=submatch(0)+1/g | echo line('$')
Uh, thats..... simple???
vi"
If your cursor is within two quotes on a line, it will select everything inside those quotes to (c)hange, (y)ank or (d)elete or whatever you want. Great if you're the sort of person who writes HTML by hand all the time.For more fun, activate vim-surround. E.g. to replace surrounding quotes with parentheses: cs"(
I think kakoune works like that, but I don’t have the will to learn another editor and vi is what’s available everywhere anyway
E.g.
y2a(
means yank everything inside (and including) the second nested pair of parentheses out from the current point.I wish vim was better at showing what you’re going to operate on, and edit it before the operation. Eg a( could select out of the first parentheses then n to extend until everything I want selected is, then y
>>
and
<<
indent the current line right and left by one indent position respectively, typically a tab or 4 spaces, though I need to check whether it works for spaces.
Prefixing those with a number n will indent n lines, starting with the current one.
You can use any navigation command as the target, I find myself often using
>}
to indent every line until the end of the block. >ap> >}
>to indent every line until the end of the block.
Yes, that's a good one for code in languages where } marks the end of a block, such as C, C++, Java, etc.
I also use
>G
to indent from current line to end of file in a text file, or 1G>G
which is 1G to go to line 1, and then >G to indent to end of file, which indents the whole file, which can be useful for printing on paper, more so when combined with other options like shiftwidth, !fmt, etc. (also mentioned in this thread).And many other such combinations of the indent operation and some movement, for structuring text or code, are possible.
All such combinations are based on the same principles mentioned in the Stack Overflow "grok vi" comment that I posted about in this thread:
:%s/\w\+/\=submatch(0)+1/g | echo line('$')
It doesn't seem to work -- except it says "xxx substitutions", so you can assume it found exactly xxx words. Besides, it changes the original text so you need to undo. Lastly, why is it so complicated? What is the purpose of submatch()? And why echoing the number of the last line?What's useful about learning and thinking about Vim's command line is the overlap with tools such as sed, which also descends from the ed command.
Being about to use sed is REALLY useful even if it's just for simple Unix pipelines like renaming multiple files or branches in git.
I'm the author of this post, and I hope you enjoyed reading it.
I wanted to share this one-liner for fun: :%s/\w\+/\=submatch(0)+1/g | echo line('$')
Although I know there are more efficient ways to count words in a file using Vim, I wanted to be a little creative.
Lastly, I want to express my deep sadness over the passing of Bram Moolenaar. He created an extraordinary text editor that had a profound impact.
Rest in Peace Bram Moolenaar
RIP Bram.
Here’s the problem I have: I don’t often have to format unformatted JSON, but when I do, it’s almost always an error message I’m trying to parse in order to track down a bug. So I tell myself “I should really figure out how to automate this…I know it’s obviously possible, but I just really wanna fix this bug right now, so I’ll do that later.”
And then the next time it happens, I curse myself for not having researched that, and promise to do it before the next time.
So I’m just happy that I stumbled across this page. Now I don’t have to remember to research it :)
For example to navigate within a single line you can:
- f[character] (jump to character)
- w/e (jump word by word)
- A (jump to end, navigate from there)
- / (search!)
- h/l (move left/right)
- even more ways!
What’s funny is that, theoretically, some of these movements are more “efficient”, for example jumping to a specific character is a lot faster than going character by character. However, I found that I often go character by character or searching instead of f[] just because my brain finds it easier to move that way than to think “what character is that”. I use massive jumps when finding a line; but once on that line, I use very slow movements. Now, it’s totally less efficient, but it’s how my brain/fingers navigate most naturally even after repeated attempts at to train myself to use “better” methods. Perhaps my habits will change over time, but regardless it is remarkable how “personal” vim can be.
Thank you Bram!
(Edited to fix list format)
https://www.rosipov.com/blog/vim-movement-cheatsheet/
Ever now, after decades of use, I try to incorporate the most efficient methods of moving around the document and around the screen. Sometimes, when I've just held down movement keys (such as 'hjkl') to get to a specific location, I'll go back to where I was and, for example, use the find character command instead as practice.
Reformats the current long line into a paragraph of the specified width. If a word overruns the column width limit, the entire word is moved to the next line.
See here for relevant documentation: https://neovim.io/doc/user/change.html#formatting
gq is a linewise operation anyway, so gq_, gqil, and gqal all have the same effect
1) mark your lines (Shift+v then move your cursor)
2) press ':'
3) '<,'> !fmt -w 80
In the similar way I also use column to format text.
vipJ # Bloody annoying.
nnoremap q: :qI refuse to believe vim power users use it like this.
Shows git diff with head - modify git show command to taste.
command! StripTrailingWhitespace %s/\s\+$//
I'm more inclined to use it on a regular basis when it has a friendly name, even though I'm pretty handy with regex. fun! TrimWhitespace()
let l:save = winsaveview()
keeppatterns %s/\s\+$//e
call winrestview(l:save)
endfun
command! TrimWhitespace call TrimWhitespace()
Little bit more, but not too much and gives a much nicer experience IMHO.nnoremap <silent> <Leader>tl :let _s=@/<Bar>:%s/\s\+$//e<Bar>:let @/=_s<Bar>:nohl<CR>
augroup trailing_whitespace_show
autocmd!
" Make trailing whitespace red.
autocmd ColorScheme * highlight ExtraWhitespace ctermbg=red guibg=red
autocmd BufWinEnter,InsertEnter,InsertLeave * match ExtraWhitespace /\s\+$/
" Can slow things down, but show trailing whitespace as red while typing.
autocmd InsertCharPre * match ExtraWhitespace /\s\+$/
augroup END
augroup trailing_whitespace_kill
autocmd!
" Delete all trailing whitespace on-save.
autocmd FileWritePre,FileAppendPre,FilterWritePre,BufWritePre *
\ let w:wv = winsaveview() |
\ :%s/\s\+$//e |
\ call winrestview(w:wv)
augroup END set listchars+=trail:·
set list %! somecommand
So, for example, using perl to make everything uppercase: %! perl -pe '$_=uc' :%!column -t %! python
If the buffer you have open is a python script. Doesn’t work great if you have a bunch of stdout to read, but good for quick testsIt's not as much about memorizing strings as it's learning a new language.
Using a mapping will save you time if you use the same regex often but you can end up having to remember a lot of shortcuts. I find I forget rarely used mappings.
If you learn the Vim command line and regex well it can be quicker to just type what you want on demand and then use one of the methods repeating it. Then forget about it till the next time you need it.
It's also helpful if you have to use configured Vim occasionally.
And I use VSCode on a 10 year old desktop. VSCode itself is very light. It's the extensions that sometimes have performance issues. Microsoft's C++ one is by far the worst offender.
removing trailing spaces : :%s/\s+$//e
replacing tabs for spaces : :%s/\t/ /g
Annoyingly, "+" matches literal "+" by default.
You need
\s\+$
or \v\s+$
.This is IPv4 only. Have one for v6 as well?
/(?=^|[^A-Fa-f0-9:]|[^\w\:])((0{0,3}1):(|(:0{1,4}){1,5}|(0{1,4}:){1,5}|(0{1,4}:){5}0{1,4}|(0{1,4}:){1}:(0{1,4}:){3}0{1,4}|(0{1,4}:){2}:(0{1,4}:){2}0{1,4}|(0{1,4}:){3}:(0{1,4}:){1}0{1,4}|(0{1,4}:){4}:(0{1,4}:){0}0{1,4}|(0{1,4}:){1}:(0{1,4}:){2}0{1,4}|(0{1,4}:){2}:(0{1,4}:){1}0{1,4}|(0{1,4}:){3}:(0{1,4}:){0}0{1,4}|(0{1,4}:){1}:(0{1,4}:){1}0{1,4}|(0{1,4}:){2}:(0{1,4}:){0}0{1,4}|(0{1,4}:){1}:(0{1,4}:){0}0{1,4}):(0{0,3}2))(?=[^\w\:]|[^A-Fa-f0-9:]|$)/i :%!python -m json.tool
I prefer :%!jq .vim may be 10% less awful, but it’s still garbage
> When using Vi in insert mode, you cannot move around without first hitting Esc then again i or a. Vim fixes this by allowing you to use the arrow keys to move around in a file while in insert mode.
Speaking for myself, my reason for using vim is to keep my hands on the keyboard and reduce mouse usage. The other benefit is that I can stay in the terminal instead of having to switch to a GUI editor.
If those benefits don't sound enticing, then I could how it might seem unappealing.