> The only mistake Sentry made was caving to peer pressure. OSI does not own the term "open source".

I agree. After the last HN thread, and also zeeg's Twitter, I was disappointed to see him cave. There needs to be some real discussion here around the term, especially concerning the fact that OSI does not own the term. Caving to the mob^W^W"market pressure" with an apology for opinions on terms won't help kick off that hard discussion.

BUSL, SSPL, and ELv2 can be as-permissive, or even more permissive, than GPL in the majority use case.

Not all OSS is FOSS. And that's okay.