Yeah, sounds great
Yeah, sounds great
Pretty much every claim you made is misleading or false, but this one is particularly egregious. That never happened, but a lot of people like to repeat the same lies in unison pretending it did
You're effectively telling me that the claim is invalid
How is Twitter unbanning someone, who was banned for posting child pornography, being more aggressive in getting rid of it?.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/07/27/twitter...
>> Experts said that even photos that are partially obscured, such as the image shared by the influencer, typically qualify as illegal child sex abuse material, or CSAM.
>> In fact, the image in question had drawn more than 3 million views and 8,000 retweets, according to Twitter statistics on a cached version of the tweet from Tuesday.
It would be more accurate to say that they have been more aggressive in preventing third party observers to track CSAM on twitter:
Twitter Failing To Deal With Child Sexual Abuse Material, Says Stanford Internet Observatory (Jun 6, 2023,)
https://www.forbes.com/sites/emmawoollacott/2023/06/06/twitt...
* Researchers at the Stanford Internet Observatory say the company failed to deal with 40 items of child sexual abuse material (CSAM) over a period of two months between March and May this year.
* Research such as this is about to become far harder—or at any rate far more expensive—following Elon Musk’s decision to start charging $42,000 per month for its previously free API.