I get it though -- they're trying to resurrect gopher, which is what gemtext is a modernification of.
Still, I think markdown is our best shot at recovering the real web.
And yes, I know there's a standardization problem. Just pick a standard and run with it. Difficulty picking one is not a reason to pick none. And in case it wasn't obvious I'm talking about markdown without embedded html here.
But that text/markdown would have to be restricted not to include any html tags, which are allowed in the "common" md spec.
> would have to be restricted not to include any html tags
The point of this would be to deliver pure content, so "any tag" would definitely not be allowed. My user agent would decide what to render and how.
Forbidding them is a one-line change to the spec.
It really annoys me that people keep bringing this up, as if they can't imagine "markdown with html disallowed".