When the punchline of the joke is in the domain name…
A while back there used to be advice from security folks to use a consistent set of domains for all communication from your company, so that when attackers/scammers/spammers try to impersonate your domains, users are more suspicious. A partial list of Google's gTLDs from https://ntldstats.com/registry/Charleston-Road-Registry-Inc :
.goog .google .gle .youtube .gmail .android .chrome .gbiz
I don't know how many of these are being used to host user-facing sites like [0], but they also have used at least g.co as a URL shortening service.
When you scatter-shot official communication like this, it trains users to believe that your comms can and will come from just about anywhere.
If companies consolidated at that level, you'd get notified by pepsi for a recall of tostitos... Or Aquafina bottled water.
I think if the general public can identify it as a specific product line, it's fine to have that as a communication domain (and that domain should be the source of news for that product)