So if the author had done research and used sources, they may not have made a bunch of factual errors.
[0] https://www.capradio.org/articles/2020/03/09/politifact-cali...
[1] https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-defines-the-sander...
From the second linked article:
> although it seems Sanders’s base is hardly all white, it’s likely that no matter who wins the nomination ... a clear majority of their votes will probably come from white Democrats
This directly contradicts the original article's quote:
> there was no evidence to show that young white men made up a majority of Sanders’s supporters
Additionally, the article's next sentence:
> The movement, in fact, consisted of a diverse coalition of people from marginalized races and genders
Appears to be an attempt at proving the majority isn't white, but it doesn't support that claim at all. It can be true that there was a diverse coalition of voters, and white people still make up a majority of votes.
Then, of all your three claims, none of them disprove the claim that most Bernie voters are white. Everything you said could be true, but none weaken the claims of the comment you're replying to.
I suspect at least someone here doesnt understand that "60% of Latino voters and 30% of white voters" doesn't imply "white is not the majority vote" (since, for example, 60% of 10 is significantly less than 30% of 1000).
The Swifties cared.
Two close friends of mine, both of them Swifties, went to a The 1975 concert only because Healy had been linked to Taylor Swift. Said two friends live half a world away from the States and hadn't listened to The 1975 at all until all this scandal. They also are totally in the dark when it comes to ct, Adam Friedland or rs.