I'm not sure there is a difference. Imhu, what we call "physical laws" are always models. Like, Newton's theory of gravity, which predicts that gravity is inverse to the square of the distance. Then Einstein came along and made a better model with relativity theory. Which cannot be the end of the story, because it is incompatible with quantum mechanics...
In finance nobody thinks they have anything approaching a law, just a regularity that somewhat predicts some phenomenon well enough to make some bucks. There's no suggestion that all the effects are captured.
There is no end. Laws are just very very well performing models. But every 'law' breaks down if you violate the assumptions of the model: make things too big/small/hot/cold etc.
You get to the end of whatever evidence you can gather. If you can explain that, you can't (and don't need) more refinements.
As far as we can tell!