1. It probably always will be

2. AFAICT some of Yarvin’s ideology, particularly Neo-feudalism, is explicitly baked into Urbit’s design.

Without the context of his writings, Urbit does not make any sense at all. It's wholly impractical technology to anyone outside of his segregationist cult.

> Should ReiserFS always be viewed through the lens of it's creator's crime?

The Linux community has broadly decided that the answer to that question is yes. No corporate Linuxes would touch it any more, and it is even scheduled for removal from the kernel.