why would you be willing to when companies can easily allocate the record profits they have to wages?
(1) I can afford it.
(2) The increase in price and latency will probably result in my ordering less stuff.
(3) I doubt that any company is going to allocate a substantial portion of their profits without raising prices. If it’s between raising prices, which I can afford, and people who do difficult jobs I depend on not having an easier, fairer life, then I’ll choose the raised prices.
No, you just stated your generous intent. You have to order the same amount in order to properly support the UPS driver. Ordering less stuff will reduce the demand for UPS drivers, causing some to be fired. You have now harmed UPS drivers, treating them unfairly.
I can only control the part of the transaction that originates from me. My commitment is to seek out the solution that seems, to my level of understanding and investigation, to result in the fairest treatment of workers given my lack of price sensitivity.
To do anything less is to give in to capitalist nihilism. It's tempting, but I'm not there yet, personally.