Hacker News Reader

Comment by JenrHywy | Hacker News Reader

Yeah our (concrete tile) roof is about 80 years old. The only maintenance has been replacing broken tiles after a particularly bad hail storm.

View on HN

Wait really? Why are we using regular (asphalt?) shingles?

As an Australian who has moved to the USA, I don't know why it's done. I don't know a single person in Australia who has ever replaced their roof. My dad lives in the same house I was born in 40 years ago, same roof. I've been in Colorado for 4 years. We had a new roof put on 2 years ago, then another 6 weeks ago due to a bad hail storm.

A quick search suggests that it's because historically clay tile roofs didn't do well in environments that regularly drop below freezing (like Colorado). It sounds like newer materials can handle freezing weather fine, so our usage of asphalt probably is just a cultural habit at this point.

Slate handles cold weather and lasts for hundreds of years. It also looks fucking awesome.

We don't use it anymore because it's expensive.

Also because no one knows how to handle it anymore and ignorant roofers will break your really expensive slate roof.

Installing tiles requires more skill than asphalt.

In California, because of clumsy rules around workers compensation insurance, low-skilled high-risk labor is much cheaper than high-skilled labor. As a homebuilder explained it to me: if you hire actual roofers you have to pay very high insurance rates (roofing is quite dangerous). But if you hire day laborers and tell them to install the roof, you don't. So they prefer roof designs that day laborers can install.

There are also earthquakes, during which I'd rather have shingles than concrete tiles above me.

But there's wildfires, in which case you want tiles not extremely flammable petroleum products above you.

Asphalt shingles are usually quite resistant to fire. IIRC, wildfires most often enter a structure through a window.

What about the rest of the country. What state predominantly installs tiled roofs?

Florida has a lot of houses with tile roofs. I think Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas also have lots of places with tile roofs due to the Southwest aesthetic.

California also has wildfires and at least in SoCal the homes primarily use a fire resistant tile or slate.

Haha, no. Some high end housing uses clay or tile, but the vast vast majority of roofs in California are Asphalt shingle.

[https://kelly-roofing.com/what-roof-styles-are-popular-in-ca...]

Installing concrete tiles requires pretty much no skill. Anyone could do it after watching a 20 min youtube video. They literally just interlock and hold each other in place. You only need to nail down edge ones. A whole roof can be done in a day by 2 people - and most of the time is spend hauling the tiles to the roof - they're heavy!!

The weight of roofing construction above the truss/rafter may be estimated with the calculator below[1]:

Clay tile (10.8 lbm/ft2, 52.7 kg/m2)

Concrete tile (9.3 lbm/ft2, 45.4 kg/m2)

Slate - 3/8" thick (12.8 lbm/ft2, 62.5 kg/m2)

Slate - 1/2" thick (18.8 lbm/ft2, 91.8 kg/m2)

Slate - 3/4" thick (26.0 lbm/ft2, 127 kg/m2)

Asphalt roll roofing (1.1 lbm/ft2, 5.4 kg/m2)

Asphalt shingle or asphalt-fiberglass composite shingle (2.7 lbm/ft2, 13.2 kg/m2)

Metal roofing - aluminum or steel - panel, sheet or shingle (1.2 lbm/ft2, 5.9 kg/m2)

[1] https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/roofing-materials-weight-...

I did find it super weird the first time I heard of Americans using asphalt shingles. Everything over here is either corrugated steel (often powdercoated) or tiles, apart from some fancy upmarket properties with zinc roofs.

As child poster notes, the weight is a factor, and US houses uses wood frames for construction, where warmer parts may use brick construction. Can carry heavier roofs.

My house is wood frame, brick veneer. It was relatively cheaply built government housing back in the 40s/50s. It seems to have held up just fine with the weight of concrete tiles.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com