There are two types of nix users.
Those who tried it and swear by it.
Those who tried it and swear at it along with words like 'never again'.
Those who tried it and swear by it.
Those who tried it and swear at it along with words like 'never again'.
Those who tried it, and avoid it in favor of Guix, but would use Nix if they had to.
nix on the other hand, I loved the concept and idea, but it was just too much of a 'stop sign' followed by 'we don't do that kind of user activity here' to be usable. I tried for a few weeks to bend our wills together, but the systems' will won and I walked away.
I suspect my experience with guix would have been remarkably similar if I hadn't been put off by the speed - I love scheme, but guile has always seemed the second slowest implementation ever, and I suspected that was the cause for it taking so long to do anything in guix.
This is only usually a problem if you want to download something large or do a large update though. If you're just downloading a small program or you update your system frequently, it's quite reasonable to use.
As far as the "stop sign", I have never really run into that with Guix, and I did run into that with Nix. The fact that Scheme - unlike the Nix language - is not purely functional, I think encourages users to do what they want, even if it goes against the spirit of the functional package manager.
Please don't take this as "you're wrong" or to somehow invalidate your experience. In the two years of running Guix as my main system, the only time I've thought something was slow was in building Chromium from source (which took all night to compile). Everything else I never noticed. Certainly not downloads. Those were fine for me both in the US and in Europe. Your experience contrasts so sharply with mine, I wonder what the difference is?
Sometimes downloads are fine though. I think it's an issue of load on the servers that will cause downloads to be slow sometimes.