Honestly, after reading his complaint (https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mad.259...), I'm not at all sympathetic. He got acquihired into a senior role after 10 years as CEO of his startup, ended up overseeing another team's real-time efforts, and by his own account went absolutely nuclear when they didn't agree with him about what "real-time" meant. If he made any efforts whatsoever to resolve the disagreement before going around and complaining to other executives about his team, he doesn't mention it.

This sounds very much to me like a story of a power-tripping ex-CEO whose technical knowledge is not as strong as he'd like to think.