Back in my day science wasn't so defensive. They would simply explain how they can use this tiny amount of data to draw the conclusions they are presenting.
It's not science's job to do your homework.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gish_gallop
> It's not science's job to do your homework.
It isn't my homework. I'm not the one demanding that I be given the levers of power.
You can claim to want an explanation while refusing to read it, but don't expect anyone else to take you seriously.
https://climate.copernicus.eu/july-2023-sees-multiple-global...
explains it well enough. The data available by Copernicus is exhaustive and high quality.
I didn't find the part where they explained how they know that's sufficient data to draw all the conclusions that are being made about climate.
> I rest my case.
Alright then. I'm unconvinced.
1850 - 2023
https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/monitoring/climate-at-a-gla...
1936 was below the long term average, 1937 was above ... but still much cooler than 2023.