No, it's not. Patent trolling has a specific meaning (having vacuous broad patents or using patents against companies who aren't really infringing, associated with not having an actual product and making your money off this, usually having hoarded many patents exactly for this purpose).
This is simply the creator of this design enforcing their patent, like any business with a patented product does.
>Not that they should be able to prevent the production of those inventions like little dictators - that does not advance society.
Nope, it's exactly that they should be able to control the production of their inventions. If it wasn't for that control, patents would have no practical purpose.
> [The Congress shall have Power . . . ] To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.
Now quoting from the US Patent and Trademark Office at https://www.uspto.gov/patents/basics/essentials#questions
"A U.S. patent gives you, the inventor, the right to “exclude others from making, using, offering for sale, or selling” an invention or “importing” it into the U.S. ... What is granted is not the right to make, use, offer for sale, sell or import the invention, but the right to stop others from doing so. If someone infringes on your patent, you may initiate legal action."
Perhaps you did not explain it well enough and can provide more details?
Without it, I see no serious conflict or disagreement between my quick summary and the more complete history at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_patent_law
You very obviously have not. I'm not going to do your job for you and spoon-feed it to you like a child. This isn't complicated, any truly introspective person with critical thinking skills can handle this.
> "That is not what a patent is for. It may unfortunately currently be legal, but that isn't its true purpose."
I know the original purpose of copyright was to inhibit publication the government did not want, which only later became modern copyright. I cannot find anything equivalent for patent law.
If its true purpose is to make money for the elite, I think that's no surprise to anyone. But that seems to be the purpose of most laws, and no reason to single out patent law nor be so opaque.
Given that several others responded to your comment the same way I did, I suppose you think we are all like simple-minded children. I trust you realize that even the smartest of people may need more than "isn't its true purpose" as a hint?
I do hope your "study it out"[1]-like response isn't hiding some baseless conspiracy theory.
[1] https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2012/10/12/1143767/--Study-...
Romney Supporter: All you have to do is study it out. Just study it out and you'll see. You haven't done your homework, buddy.
Matthews: What do I need to study?
Romney Supporter: He's a communist. And those of us who are not voting for him know it.