Remote lockout is terrifying. I understand the need for 'security', but still.
not even for that...
It is a common trope in modern times for companies to use "security" as a method to prevent ownership of a product, Apple does it, Tesla does it, Microsoft Does it, most companies use this excuse
You can have security with out giving up ownership
By ownership, i use that under the original term, that I the owner of product have the sole and exclusive control over the property.
In this case it was human error (or an antiquated payment system). But is the remote lockout bug free?
Of course it isn’t. This is an example of a big in the system.