>ARM is dead
Not dead (yet). Just a legacy ISA.
>everybody is going to switch to RISC-V
RISC-V is inevitable.
Not dead (yet). Just a legacy ISA.
>everybody is going to switch to RISC-V
RISC-V is inevitable.
Exactly, I find this sort of fanaticism about an instruction set (of all things) so puzzling.
Many of the comments which mention RISC-V have anything constructive to say or any meaningful arguments. All the fanboyism makes me feel a bit like I'm on reddit (or worse)...
I recognize the value of some level of coordination in marketing efforts, and as I'm no expert I just follow their recommendations, like "RISC-V is inevitable".