I think you're forgetting that this is a $30 Rasp. Pi battery solution that I'm talking about.
When your battery wears out, recycle the old Lead Acid battery and buy a new one. Its not that big of a deal. The battery I spec'd out is a 15lb battery (~7 kg). Heavier than LiFePo4 for sure, but no one is going to have issues moving, replacing, or buying new batteries.
--------
Anyway, I recognize that LiFePo4 is superior durability by a long shot. Thousands of cycles instead of hundreds, yes. My overall point however, is that "hundreds of cycles" is still years in this use case, and I don't think you've challenged the math too much from that perspective.
Obviously, I'd prefer to keep on the cheaper-side of Lead-Acid batteries. But the more expensive Trojan AES batteries or "Gel" batteries have far better durability (rather than the cheapest AGMs that I've been talking about)
I'm talking 1400 cycles at 100% DoD without any precharge or low-charge penalties for Trojan AES (though this is a very new battery only coming out this year). Trojan is working on making Lead Acid competitive vs Lithium Ion and have the cream-of-the-crop Lead Acid chemistries.
But even "Gel" (more expensive than AGMs) type Lead Acids have specifications for 100% DoD cycles, 300 to 500 depending on brand.
---------------
Anyway, this has gone on for many posts. But here's my arguments to finalize.
1. Float-charging "feature" for Lead Acid grossly simplifies circuit design. You possibly don't need a charge controller at all anymore (feasible design with just diodes), although if you want decent charge speeds you'll need to build your own charge controller. (though this seems doable with uCs and/or OpAmps to make CC-CV circuits).
2. Very low explosion risk, so this is appropriate for hobbyists (unlike Li-ion which even LiFePo4 have had some worrying fires). So DYI controllers for LiFePo4 is an issue of trusting the battery-controller and the brand you buy, details I don't have to worry about with Lead Acid.
3. Lead Acid has less durability, "hundreds" depending on brand (and yes, I'm talking about 100% DoD specs, not 50% specs like you wanna talk about). By my estimation, this provides years of service though this obviously depends on various assumptions.
4. Lead Acid's linear voltage is an advantage when determining DoD when building your own controllers (ex: 13V OCV means you're likely full, and 11.6V OCV means you're likely empty, and 12.3V means you're at 50%). LiFePo4 has "constant voltage", which is better for efficiency and power but it makes state-of-charge far more difficult to perform if you're building your own charge circuitry.
----------
LiFePo4 is a "superior" battery from a durability perspective. But no one seems to want to float-charge this thing for extended periods of time, and I certainly don't want to have an explosion risk while I test that out.
And "downsides" (like Lead Acid's linear voltage drop, leading to lower efficiencies) are advantages with regards to circuit simplicity and circuit design. A *simpler* design is more suited for hobbyists, even if its got worse technical specs than a more sophisticated chemistry.