Hacker News Reader

> if you need this book, you're going to be roadkill in math contests

> I have not seen anyone including Polya successfully /teach/ this ability.

This is a pretty wild take. For alternate takes, see John Horton Conway's foreword to the most recent edition of the book. There he talks about how amazing the book is for both students and teachers, including the things he learned from it as both a student and teacher. Or see Terry Tao's blog post on solving mathematical problems [0], in which he says he learned from the Polya book when preparing for Mathematics Olympiads. Conway and Tao are widely considered outside the "roadkill" category of mathematicians.

> If you want to be good at math, piano, chess, sculpture, or whatever you need the talent and then it can be nurtured.

The "either you got it or you don't" theory used to be common wisdom, but it's not supported by empirical evidence and these days it's mostly relegated to grouchy coach stock character stereotypes. You need a sustained level of interest, you need practice, and you need some amount of courage, but there's no real evidence for an innate ability that some people got and some people don't.

[0] https://terrytao.wordpress.com/career-advice/solving-mathema...

> Conway and Tao are widely considered outside the "roadkill" category of mathematicians.

Ah, but they didn't really /need/ Polya's book.

This “need” standard doesn’t seem useful. You could say they don’t need anything besides air, water, food and shelter.

Come on, you don't really /need/ shelter.

"Genius is 1 percent inspiration and 99 percent perspiration."

https://quoteinvestigator.com/2012/12/14/genius-ratio/

Thank you for taking the time to debunk such comments. I have serious imposter syndrome as a minority woman in software, literally the only one among 60 others and everyday is a battle with my inner thought process. For an onlooker, I have amazing achievements behind me and there's no reason I shouldn't be confident, but I'm not and seeing such comments as before has made it worse over time, without me questioning it.

>If you want to be good at math, piano, chess, sculpture, or whatever you need the talent and then it can be nurtured.

No offense, but you sound like you don't really know anything about these disciplines, or about the science of learning (Peak is a good book to read). Getting a good piano teacher will absolutely accelerate your progress and being talented at piano as a kid is a pretty bad predictor of how good you'll be as an adult. Every outstanding Piano "talent" you see on stage today has been nurtured and nurtured themselves through practice, to hell and back.

None taken but you don't know about my (adult) piano adventure with good teachers over 15+ years, either. I didn't say practice was not important. You can't squeeze blood from a stone.

You say that if someone has the chops to be a real mathlete they won't need Polya's _How To Solve It_

I'll say I went to college 25 years ago with people who had competed internationally in high school and who placed competitively on the Putnam, and they LOVED Polya's book.

I think whether you enjoy seeing strategies laid out well--—whether or not you've been able to figure some of it out yourself---depsnds more on your personality than on how good you are at solving creative math problems.

> As others have mentioned, none of Polya matters for selecting and attacking research problems.

While I am not familiar with research problems, and do not pretend to be, some of the strategies to tackle problems in this book are universal. Like finding a similar problem, or a simplified case, or divide and conquer, etc. etc.

Yea, these are 100% exactly how you should approach a research problem, in mathematics or otherwise.

Literally the first part of almost every research paper is outlining how this thing you're about to talk about is similar and dissimilar to other things. That's often followed by a simplified description of the idea. Then that's usually followed by the thing in full generality.

beyond the book, what contributions did he make? it would seem like the techniques should have helped him solve problems but Wikipedia does not show anything else

Surely you’re joking. Polya pioneered so much combinatorics I don’t even know where to begin. Heck, a lot of counting problems reduces to polya’s enumeration theorem. The page of “references” to stuff named after him should be a clue to you.

Definitely. Whatever one may think of "How to Solve It," Polya was a renowned mathematician. The book is like the Richard Hamming lectures that often come up on HN: Great thoughts from a great mind but not easily applied by the average or even above average Joe.

Richard hamming lectures? I'd google, but I wouldn't know if I'd found the ones you meant.

Try https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35776480

https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL2FF649D0C4407B30

But besides combinatorics, what has he done for us lately? ;)

>lately

Luckily for the world, he dodged the 'startup craze' bullet ;) - by living before it started up :)

Every so often there's a comment on here that's simultaneously so ignorant and so arrogant that it crosses from offensive to hilarious. Congrats, this one is up there with the likes of "it could just be rsync".