RTO orders look like a way for elite, work-obsessed CEOs to grab power back
businessinsider.com
businessinsider.com
> "For most employees, life is partly work, but partly things outside work," Stanford economist Nick Bloom said. "These elite CEOs probably work 100-plus hours a week and they're much more work-focused." The mandates symbolize the sharp disconnect right now between the way CEOs and employees think about work.
I see that Nick Bloom is as highly cited researcher with a bunch of clout, but his speculation that people like the Goldman sachs ceo "work" anywhere near 100 hours a week really throw into doubt his veracity.
That said the rest of his work seems solid, just an odd off the cuff remark imo, or a different definition of "work"
Playing golf. Talking about work over lavish lunches. Having flexibility in your days to go to the gym, run errands, these things all extend the "work" week.
:)
The policies aren't even coherent enough to motivate companies to actually make their workplaces conducive to effectiveness.
That they're willing to sacrifice effectiveness for an illusory sense of control is precisely what I'm characterizing as bizarre ;-).
I do believe that this should rather refer to the theater where work merely appears to happen.
They're worried you might be working two jobs, or might make/join a startup and compete with them, or generally not feel enslaved to your employer.
At at the very top, at the big shareholder level, they don't want the middle class having too much freedom, because they do pose a potential threat to them.
In this day and age, you don’t innovate, you mostly sell crap online and build an empire by living in some low cost country. Innovation only happens at work these days behind heavy IP protection laws and NDAs.