Come close to solving the toy problem of autonomous driving first, we're still waiting.
My Tesla drives and navigates itself most of the time. 90-95% at least, just not 100%.
As apposed to cars 10 or more years ago which didn’t do any of that.
To me it is much like the “God of the Gaps” when tremendous progress on a big problem is dismissed negatively, due to the (continuously shrinking) gaps of what it can’t do.
But I think all these complementary takes on the problem, with significant year-to-year progress by all three firms, are fantastic.
That used to be considered a fast learning curve!
And not delivering AGI yet is a problem?
What are these broad technology schedule based criticisms founded on?
I really want to understand this viewpoint!
Hopefully not the over-optimism of anyone who uses optimistic timelines as a motivational force. That’s not real data. Or a suitable benchmark for human progress.