Hacker News Reader

I never saw anyone complain that crates.io isn't curated. Why is this suddenly an issue when discussing shipping prebuilt binaries? If it's somehow ok to download the source code as-is, why is it a problem if crates.io builds it for you?

Some problems have solutions, but people need to seek for solutions instead of collecting problems.

View on HN

I'm not complaining that it's not curated, specifically because it's exclusively a source code package directory. Auditing source code for safety is hard, doing so with a binary is much harder.

I wouldn't mind if rust had reproducible builds, and the binaries had to be built+signed by both the original author and crates.io. But how the article describes it seems sketchy

Reply on news.ycombinator.com