Indian artists take government to court over 'chilling' tech laws

context.news

56 points·alraj··8 comments

the EU Digital Services Act also has provisions which enable governments to demand removal of content from online platforms. US Gov method is more implicit, through embedding 'ex'-employees into online safety teams and demanding backdoor surveillance on messaging.

Seems like we are all marching toward the same future, via slightly different routes

> the EU Digital Services Act also has provisions which enable governments to demand removal of content from online platforms

And without prior warrant nor judicial authorisation !

> US Gov method is more implicit, through embedding 'ex'-employees into online safety teams and demanding backdoor surveillance on messaging.

I have seen this claim a couple time on HN in the last week. Did I miss the source for this?

We have reached peak authoritarism I see.

It's a shame that a country of 1.4B can't produce a competent opposition.

All governments in the world are capable of ordering the likes of Twitter and YouTube to censor or remove content if they wish to operate in their jurisdiction. This is nothing new.

India has a competent opposition. But any competent opposition is limited in democratically fighting an authoritarian regime that doesn't subscribe to democratic values.

Who can? Most countries are ruled by the same groups for decades, or by mobs temporarily. In some there is an illusion of opposition. Like in Russia 'opposition' is being played by actors. With a few real, but they don't live long.

Artist turned political activist turned attention seeker. The headline is quite sneaky to omit his tantrums of past years.

Even if the stand is right, Kunal kamra has lost all credibility for me. I would rather support someone else making similar points than this joke of a person.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com