What are you talking about? If you somehow know better then link or reference the sources.
I did A16Z already. This only involves a very easy google search, and maybe throw in some crunchbase searches. It’s an absolutely trivial task and I’d expect you to try doing this exercise on at least one other VC that you’re interested in.
I could do an exhaustive analysis of public data, but that would be more of a blog post than a discussion comment. I expect you to put in a minimum amount of effort towards fact-checking if you want people to take your strong opinions seriously.
I need you to answer this question so that when I do the analysis I’m not wasting time analyzing investment firms that you don’t think represent Silicon Valley.
I’ll write the blog post for you. But not if you won’t participate in this discussion with a bare minimum of contributing effort. Otherwise it’s purely a one-way discussion, where I do all the work and you just say “no no no”. But I haven’t gotten a single constructive iota from you in this entire discussion. You’ve put in zero effort at all.
Usual HN custom is to answer one question after the other user answers one, or two for two, etc., not to ignore them and immediately demand answers to subsequent questions. And I had already answered two without even getting an answer to:
>Why would I be asserting that to you or anyone else?