Title says after not because...
“Tech stocks down as trade talks stall with China”
They’re rarely related. Two things happened, and they put “as” between them.
Was this person in SF anywhere near this taxi?
I’m not commenting on the ethical implications of this usage, only the specific mechanisms they use to avoid assigning cause in the event that they end up wrong.
The intent is the link them together.
"Man dies after brushing teeth in morning." <- Might be true, but completely useless and irrelevant.
> 160k People Die in USA After Cruise Robotaxi...
The causation/correlation is strong in that type of sentence.