A link to the previous (extensive) discussion before it was seemingly deleted:
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3739913
Perhaps it was the title? Almost makes a case for the reverse of HN's policy on using the original article title.
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3739913
Perhaps it was the title? Almost makes a case for the reverse of HN's policy on using the original article title.