Airbnb bookings dry up in New York as new short-stay rules are introduced
theguardian.com
theguardian.com
> More than two guests at a time are not allowed, either, meaning families are effectively barred.
Are they mistaken?
>“In New York City, residential apartments should be for residential use,” said Murray Cox of Inside Airbnb, a housing advocacy group that collects data about the company’s presence in cities around the world.
NYTimes: New York City’s Crackdown on Airbnb Is Starting. Here’s What to Expect
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37404522
Wired: The End of Airbnb in New York
People will spend twenty minutes reacting emotionally to this, never pay much attention to empirical changes in response, and never realize it was just fomo on their part.
It was incredibly obvious from your first post that the person lambasting others for "reacting emotionally" was likely a host who might feel just a bit threatened by this news and buries their head in the sand when one of their sources of income pisses off others. "I'd rather keep getting mine, consequences to others be damned, fuck you very much."
>Enjoy your cope, peasant.
See? Just like that.
Sarcasm aside, I'm pretty sure that, "YoU'rE jUsT jEaLoUs," and not providing any other kind of counterargument for those opposed to Airbnb is a great example of "reacting emotionally".
Why?
I’m not completely against it but I don’t want a short term rental next door.
Cities/villages should designate areas for short term rentals and tax accordingly.