> lets them combine separate claims together and only arbitrate 15 of them
Link to the language? I don't believe they can dismiss an unrelated claim on the basis of having argued another.
Link to the language? I don't believe they can dismiss an unrelated claim on the basis of having argued another.
I misremembered; it’s 16, not 15
Each side picks eight cases while the others are held. Once those sixteen are decided the rest are resolved, collectively, taking those sixteen cases’ resolutions into account. At each step, you can dispute the characterisation, and Zoom pays the arbitration fees.
Nobody’s case is ignored. It’s to avoid this [1].
[1] https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/uber-loses-appeal-b...