I mean, if that's not a good way to funnel money from the lower classes to the rich, I don't know what is.
I mean, if that's not a good way to funnel money from the lower classes to the rich, I don't know what is.
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/09/06/texas-paid-bitcoin-miner-rio...
That is you need to buy servers and keep them functional in order to get the subsidy. The subsidy isn't enough pay for the servers on its own. Probably bitcoin itself doesn't pay enough for the servers/power/space it needs anymore, though that requires analysis that I can't perform.
Does one need a minimum number of rigs? Maybe a permit? Just apply to the utility?
I’d rather be paid than volunteer to sit around in the dark, sweating like a chump.
> (1) the facility requires a total load of more than 75 megawatts; and
Then I register with ERCOT... and profit. They seem to have passed a few bothersome "bills" to thwart our attempts at being a giant resistor though. Also, so they don't seem to specify any efficiency rating for the whole endeavor. Perhaps I can literally install a giant power resistor + a few GPUs, claim 75 MW, turn it all off and then head to the bank?